There is a difference between different points of view having different experiences with software bugs to flat out lying by taking sequence of events such as posts as justification of your wrong assumptions when those posts hadn't been made yet
What you say not only doesn't make any sense, it's not related to this in any way. I'll make it simpler:
- You opened this thread reporting double VGDS, I was never able to replicate it.
- You came back with it, reporting a completely different issue, the wrong initial height.
I just asked:
- Do you have double VGDS NOW ? You replied you don't know, because of course you don't trust it was fixed, because it would then clash with your narrative that I ignore problems that I cannot replicate.
- About your new problem, me acknowledging that I CAN replicate this, albeit not as severe as in your case, also disparage your statement I always say I can't replicate something. I'm not, I always say exactly what is happening.
BOTH issues clearly show how wrong you were saying I don't acknowledge issues, the 1st because the problem I couldn't replicate HAS been "fixed in the blind", clearly proving that even things that cannot be replicate ARE taken into account and end up in actual fixes. The 2nd is undeniable: I literally said it does happen here, what else you want ?