Who is making what SCENERY....

[bradl]

I can't remember where his forum is at, but Shez Ansari is working on KLGB. He recently asked us at vZLA for beta testers of the scenery.

BL.

[Frank Lindberg]

Yes Sir, I already own it   It's beautiful.  

[newmanix]

add to your list the following:

Oslo Gardermoen FS9/FSX http://www.fsdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=20442

Salzburg FS9/FSX http://www.friendlyflusi.at/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=19403

Leeds Bradford FS9/FSX (released) http://www.mexsim.com/

Billund FS9/FSX (released) http://www.aero-files.com/shop/product.php?id_product=41

And fyi FlightBeam is testing SFO for backport to FS9. Mir says so far it's working.

[Anders Bermann]

...
And fyi FlightBeam is testing SFO for backport to FS9. Mir says so far it's working.
...

Really??? I didn't know FlightBeam was considering backporting their scenery to FS9?
Where'd you read about that?

[newmanix]

...
And fyi FlightBeam is testing SFO for backport to FS9. Mir says so far it's working.
...

Really??? I didn't know FlightBeam was considering backporting their scenery to FS9?
Where'd you read about that?

Try reading their fourm. That's a good start. 

[cmpbllsjc]

Salzburg FS9/FSX http://www.friendlyflusi.at/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=19403

I had no idea another version of Salzburg was comming out.

I already have this one for FSX and its really good http://www.rgflight.com/

I wonder what the difference between the two will be, aside from there being an FS9 version as well.

[Anders Bermann]

...
And fyi FlightBeam is testing SFO for backport to FS9. Mir says so far it's working.
...

Really??? I didn't know FlightBeam was considering backporting their scenery to FS9?
Where'd you read about that?

Try reading their fourm. That's a good start. 

Hehe! Right-o ... right back at ya... or something...
Thanks!

[newmanix]

Salzburg FS9/FSX http://www.friendlyflusi.at/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=19403

I had no idea another version of Salzburg was comming out.

I already have this one for FSX and its really good http://www.rgflight.com/

I wonder what the difference between the two will be, aside from there being an FS9 version as well.

Gianni's version will include the city of Salzburg same as he did LOWI and AES lite traffic/trains as well as AES.

[CX 747-400]

add to your list the following:

Oslo Gardermoen FS9/FSX http://www.fsdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=20442

Salzburg FS9/FSX http://www.friendlyflusi.at/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=19403

Leeds Bradford FS9/FSX (released) http://www.mexsim.com/

Billund FS9/FSX (released) http://www.aero-files.com/shop/product.php?id_product=41

And fyi FlightBeam is testing SFO for backport to FS9. Mir says so far it's working.

I have added Leeds, and Salzburg. Billard was already released before starting this thread, so I dont want to start adding stuff that already exists in both sims. I am reluctant to add Oslo, only because I dont want to see FSdeveloper get bombared with questions about when will it be out, plus if I add that one, then there are several others that I would have to add. Next thing you know I will have to have my own website to to handle the 100's on products that are in developement at any given time. I hope you understand.

[newmanix]

And here I thought the purpose of this topic was to notify the community of sceneries in development, on the horizon, or simply sceneries most people don't know about. Did you or did you not ASK people to add to the list for you to update? If this is too much work for you you should have not asked people to post here for you to update your little list. But in reality you just want to add what you feel like adding as if this is your forum. Who cares about who enquirers at FS developer? Are you the forum moderator there? Why is it an issue for you personally if FSdeveloper get bombared with questions about when will it be out? If anything, it helps the developer make his product more well known hence more sales. What makes that any different then the other sceneries you posted??

I see now why some developers don't like people posting topics like this in their forums...

Lol YOU don't want FSdeveloper to get bombarded with questions... you like to make yourself feel important huh? 

[Bruce Hamilton]

You posted the titles and links to find them, why does he need to update his list?  The entire thread is basically a list of who is doing what, right?   

[newmanix]

You posted the titles and links to find them, why does he need to update his list?  The entire thread is basically a list of who is doing what, right?   

If im not mistaken he said if he is missing anything to post here and he would update the list Bruce. Did YOU read the initial topic post? Perhaps you should before adding redundant responces.

[PUP4ORD]

The most important thing to remember, Some of the airports everybody has been waiting for are currently being made or in the process of being released. SFOX should be a prime example........yes.

[CX 747-400]

And here I thought the purpose of this topic was to notify the community of sceneries in development, on the horizon, or simply sceneries most people don't know about. Did you or did you not ASK people to add to the list for you to update? If this is too much work for you you should have not asked people to post here for you to update your little list. But in reality you just want to add what you feel like adding as if this is your forum. Who cares about who enquirers at FS developer? Are you the forum moderator there? Why is it an issue for you personally if FSdeveloper get bombared with questions about when will it be out? If anything, it helps the developer make his product more well known hence more sales. What makes that any different then the other sceneries you posted??

I see now why some developers don't like people posting topics like this in their forums...

Lol YOU don't want FSdeveloper to get bombarded with questions... you like to make yourself feel important huh? 

The answer to FSdeveloper is a simple one... I like going there and being able to get answers, and ideas, without the hassle of sorting thru a thousand useless postings about when it will be ready. I have been that person asking that question a couple of times, and have since then discovered I hate; espcially after spending more and more time on the FlyTampa forums. Also,  after spending several years watching FSDeveloper, I have also learned that there is a very high rate of which projects are started and never released. Granted that rate has gotten better recently. DO you want to see hundred of useless posts at FSdeveloper? I dont! I can get that at FlyTampa. I have no issues what so ever providing information for upcoming sceneries, and I have no issues posting them to the front page; in fact I enjoy it. I spend a lot of time almost everynight checking all the pages, and forums trying to keep this as up to date as possible. I hope that you understand that I am not trying to be selfish about FSdeveloper; but rather I look at there website as a tool for designing and learning how to build within the FS world, and not as a scenery manufacturer.

[newmanix]

I can respect that, Mr. CX and to a certain degree I agree with you. However, if a personal developer doesn't want to be bombarded about their projects, they don't have to post them to the world in the first place....

Cheers!