Again, you are missing my point. I fly EXCLUSIVELY in the US. So why penalize me and force me to edit each and every airport in USA that I fly into or out of, just to get rid of the rear stairs which ARE NEVER USED IN USA airports that have jetways!
You are penalized in your desire to use of GSX by refusing to customize the airport, in ways far more important than the purely visual appearance of a rear staircase that won't even be used by passengers.
And even if you don't want to customize airport yourself (which if you are ONLY interested in removing the rear stairs, takes just 3 clicks), so you are only an user of pre-made profiles, if the rear staircases are really such a big problem for profile creators as it seems to be for you, I'm sure they would already configured the gates as such.
But that's besides the point. My point was JUST to try to make you understand that, customizing ( or using a custom profile ), will enhance how GSX works in ways FAR more important than that nitpicky rear-stairs feature, so it's just wrong saying you are "penalized", for something you are supposed to do anyway, if you really want to use GSX as its best.
Having made my point, it should have been clear from my last reply this feature
HAS been taken into consideration:
As you can see from the huge release notes, with weekly updates and sometimes by-weekly updates, each and every suggestion that make sense will usually end up in an update, but we cannot anticipate exactly when.
So why you took an earlier post to say I'm "missing" some kind of point ?
This feature, as my LAST previous post say,
WILL be included in an update and, the only thing that has changed, is that now we can even say WHEN: in the next update that will be out before the weekend. The option is already there, we are testing it.