« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: AES revisited  (Read 6105 times)

Dimon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 493
AES revisited
« on: January 25, 2008, 03:29:10 am »
I have noticed that AES 1.94 will include both C9 EHAM and ENBR. Why KLAX is forgotten again?
Logged
i7-6700k@4.6Ghz, Z170 Delux, 980Ti-6GB5700, 2TB EVO850, 16GB DDR4 RAM Win7/64 PRO.

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51426
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: AES revisited
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2008, 04:16:37 am »
What makes you think that the fact that KLAX will not be in the next AES release, automatically means it will never appear in future releases ?
Logged

Dimon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 493
Re: AES revisited
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2008, 01:34:46 am »
Well, if you don' deny this fact (at least), I'm happy to hear that. ::)
Logged
i7-6700k@4.6Ghz, Z170 Delux, 980Ti-6GB5700, 2TB EVO850, 16GB DDR4 RAM Win7/64 PRO.

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51426
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: AES revisited
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2008, 05:57:30 am »
I'll even be more explicit: KLAX will probably be the next one (possible together with KDCA), but we'll need some time and some additional work on it, due to how it has been made, so it will not make it for the next AES release, but it's coming.
Logged

Dimon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 493
Re: AES revisited
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2008, 05:09:59 pm »
Perferct. Thanks a lot for such long-awaited news.
Logged
i7-6700k@4.6Ghz, Z170 Delux, 980Ti-6GB5700, 2TB EVO850, 16GB DDR4 RAM Win7/64 PRO.
Pages: [1]
« previous next »