FSDreamTeam forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: TouchandGoFilms on March 22, 2010, 03:24:36 pm
-
One of my friends told me to request the airport: KEWR
He doesnt have an account, so I told him I would throw in the request for him!
Thanks! ;)
Best Regards
Slade Mitchell
Owner of Touch and Go Films
www.touchandgofilms.com
-
At least spell it properly: Suggestion.
-
Wow... great reply!
-
For some reason, I don't see this being done in the near future. I think there are more markets left completely open. At least New York now has FSDT's KJFK, not to mention the great KLGA by ImagineSim (who also made KEWR but that is very old and very much a resource hog).
-
Well I was just relaying a message, dont shoot the messenger! ;)
Ill pass that along, and I agree, though I do not like Imagine Sim KEWR, the ground textures are off.
-
Wow... great reply!
I think correct spelling is more than appropriate for "A company dedicated to perfection".
-
Wow... great reply!
I think correct spelling is more than appropriate for "A company dedicated to perfection".
Don't give him such a hard time,besides he got his message across.
-
Wow... great reply!
I think correct spelling is more than appropriate for "A company dedicated to perfection".
It was a typo...give me a break.
-
I support U regarding KEWR ;) however... there are some US airports I will prioritize first, like:
KPHX, KLAX, KSAN, KSLC and maybe KMIA :) Do U guys agree?
-
Thanks all for explaining to "thepilot".
YES! I would LOVE to see those airports done, great SUGGESTIONS.
-
;D hehe.. nice
-
I support U regarding KEWR ;) however... there are some US airports I will prioritize first, like:
KPHX, KLAX, KSAN, KSLC and maybe KMIA :) Do U guys agree?
LatinVFR has posted a message that they are going to do KMIA, but not until next year as they have other projects in front of it.
-
KPHX has been done by Mach1 Design,as for KEWR I would like to see it be done BY FSDT and there are others THAT I have mentioned before in earlier post that could be done as well.
-
Yes, Mach1 did a great job with KPHX, but why can't there products be AES compatible? For me, AES is a "must have" ;)
-
KPHX has been done by Mach1 Design,as for KEWR I would like to see it be done FSDT and there are others THAT I have mentioned before in earlier post that could be done as well.
Damn Mach 1(no offense). I would rather see a KPHX, KIAH, KDEN, KLAX, KSLC, or KHOU before Newark. And yes AES is a must have.
-
KPHX has been done by Mach1 Design,as for KEWR I would like to see it be done FSDT and there are others THAT I have mentioned before in earlier post that could be done as well.
Damn Mach 1(no offense). I would rather see a KPHX, KIAH, KDEN, KLAX, KSLC, or KHOU before Newark. And yes AES is a must have.
Damn Mach 1? They are freeware. If I were them...offense taken. No reason for that.
Personally, I'm still using my very outdated and old SimFlyers KPHX just because of the texturing and bridge and all the extras in it. However, you can bet that if I never purchased the SF KPHX scenery, I'd find the Mach 1 to be amazing. It is realistic, includes the new tower (and looks spectacular) and accomplishes the job. The best part it...IT IS FREE!
I'd love to see a new, payware KPHX but don't crap on Mach 1 for creating a simplified version of airports when they are free.
-
Yeah. That's right damn Mach 1. And you are not them. Didn't matter if you were. My opinion would stay the same. It was good for it's time. But it's time for something new. Yeah I am just shitting all over Mach 1. Just in case you are still in disbelief. I would rather see someone like FSDT to make either of the airports I listed. Especially for FSX.
-
Yeah. That's right damn Mach 1. And you are not them. Didn't matter if you were. My opinion would stay the same. It was good for it's time. But it's time for something new. Yeah I am just shitting all over Mach 1. Just in case you are still in disbelief. I would rather see someone like FSDT to make either of the airports I listed. Especially for FSX.
Okay, do you realize that this is someone's hard work (it isn't easy creating FS sceneries...you try) that they basically donated to the millions of people in the Flight Sim community? Crapping on someone's hard work that they are giving away for free is quite obnoxious.
Good for its time? Its time is now...these aren't old sceneries. All of Mach 1's sceneries were probably made within the past two or three years. In case you haven't noticed, some of FSDT's sceneries are older than Mach 1 sceneries. Again, they FSDT is more detailed but if you noticed, they cost money. Mach 1 is free.
OBVIOUSLY, everyone wants to see something more detailed than Mach 1 but that is why Mach 1 is freeware. It is intended to fill the void and give something better than default but not something they could charge $30 for.
-
...but why can't there products be AES compatible?
Have they ever asked Oliver Pabst to support their sceneries? Freeware sceneries are usually zero credits with AES, so Oliver makes no money for his efforts. If M1 is waiting for him to contact them...
-
@Sir Issac. Again read what I wrote the first time. I don't think it is all that great as you do. So reframe from telling me about the hard work it took. I told you what I thought. So no need to explain...like drivers tell cops all the time(meaning your getting a ticket anyways). Just except that is how some people feel. As I except that is how you feel. ;D
-
@Sir Issac. Again read what I wrote the first time. I don't think it is all that great as you do. So reframe from telling me about the hard work it took. I told you what I thought. So no need to explain...like drivers tell cops all the time(meaning your getting a ticket anyways). Just except that is how some people feel. As I except that is how you feel. ;D
How about this then..
If you're taking Mach1 to task, let's as the question: Can you produce anything better? If so, then please do, and show us. You knock on how bad you think Mach1 is, but don't have anything better than Mach1 to show for it. So until you do, not only don't knock them, but don't judge; for they actually have a product out, and you don't.
BL.
-
Yeah. That's right damn Mach 1. And you are not them. Didn't matter if you were. My opinion would stay the same. It was good for it's time. But it's time for something new. Yeah I am just shitting all over Mach 1. Just in case you are still in disbelief. I would rather see someone like FSDT to make either of the airports I listed. Especially for FSX.
Okay, do you realize that this is someone's hard work (it isn't easy creating FS sceneries...you try) that they basically donated to the millions of people in the Flight Sim community? Crapping on someone's hard work that they are giving away for free is quite obnoxious.
Good for its time? Its time is now...these aren't old sceneries. All of Mach 1's sceneries were probably made within the past two or three years. In case you haven't noticed, some of FSDT's sceneries are older than Mach 1 sceneries. Again, they FSDT is more detailed but if you noticed, they cost money. Mach 1 is free.
OBVIOUSLY, everyone wants to see something more detailed than Mach 1 but that is why Mach 1 is freeware. It is intended to fill the void and give something better than default but not something they could charge $30 for.
I agree that freeware...be it sceneries or aircraft can certainly fill the void between default' and payware. However, one that I know and bought a few sceneries from has a disclaimer on its website that they don't offer animated jetways...... which is why I have few of their products. In anycase, the level of detail that any flightsim product has can be of great importance.
-
Forgive me for asking a dumb question - but who, or what is Mach1 ???
-
Forgive me for asking a dumb question - but who, or what is Mach1 ???
http://mach1designgroup.webs.com/scenery.htm (http://mach1designgroup.webs.com/scenery.htm)
-
Forgive me for asking a dumb question - but who, or what is Mach1 ???
MACH1 offers freeware sceneries for FS9 AND updating for FSX. 8)
-
Thank You!
-
@Sir Issac. Again read what I wrote the first time. I don't think it is all that great as you do. So reframe from telling me about the hard work it took. I told you what I thought. So no need to explain...like drivers tell cops all the time(meaning your getting a ticket anyways). Just except that is how some people feel. As I except that is how you feel. ;D
How about this then..
If you're taking Mach1 to task, let's as the question: Can you produce anything better? If so, then please do, and show us. You knock on how bad you think Mach1 is, but don't have anything better than Mach1 to
show for it. So until you do, not only don't knock them, but don't judge; for they actually have a product out, and you don't.
How about this. Don't tell me what I can and can't like nor don't agree with. I'm not going to sit in these rooms and hold someones dick on a scenery nor anything else. Just cause I am not fawns of it doesn't speak for you or anyone else. I just didn't care for it as much as others and I just voiced my opinion. So, get off it. Real talk. I was also stating that it would be nice to see it done by FSDT in terms of quality. I knocked them and there is not a damn thing you can do about it other than except ones opinion. I'm sorry you and others got thier feelings hurt. But get the F$&k over it. There are other things that I would agree with on a lot of other posts. But I don't hear no praises. Only when someone feels offended. So to you and everyone else. My opinion was expessed on the sole facts of how I felt not to make you yall feel bad. So let's move on to something else. Thank you. :)
BL.
-
Lol man...I am not "hurt" or upset. I was merely stating my opinion that you were being kinda rude.
Seriously, why knock it when it is free? They never intended for it to be the best out there, only to be a free alternative. I have no problem with not being a fan of it (I'm not really a fan of all their sceneries) but I'm not going to publicly say they are bad and "damn them" as that is unnecessary. They are donating work to the Flight Sim community, free of charge.
It is frustrating to hear that people have no respect for the amount of time freeware developers put into their work and then they ask for nothing in return. But I guess that sums up general American society. :-\
-
I understand it is freeware. And damn them is just a figure of speech. Not literally damn them to hell. Anyhow. You last statement is like in law enforcement. It is fustrating that there are people that do t like cops when they are out to protect people at least the good ones. But you don't here them complaining. Life just goes on. I am not you nor you are not me. You might not go public but I will blow the whistle. Now I am not saying that I would take default over that. But there are some freeware out there that I would just rather use default.
-
I understand it is freeware. And damn them is just a figure of speech. Not literally damn them to hell. Anyhow. You last statement is like in law enforcement. It is fustrating that there are people that do t like cops when they are out to protect people at least the good ones. But you don't here them complaining. Life just goes on. I am not you nor you are not me. You might not go public but I will blow the whistle. Now I am not saying that I would take default over that. But there are some freeware out there that I would just rather use default.
I have no idea what you are talking about. :P
-
I understand it is freeware. And damn them is just a figure of speech. Not literally damn them to hell. Anyhow. You last statement is like in law enforcement. It is fustrating that there are people that do t like cops when they are out to protect people at least the good ones. But you don't here them complaining. Life just goes on. I am not you nor you are not me. You might not go public but I will blow the whistle. Now I am not saying that I would take default over that. But there are some freeware out there that I would just rather use default.
I have no idea what you are talking about. :P
There's something wrong when a minor group in the forum ruins the discussion. :-[
-
I understand it is freeware. And damn them is just a figure of speech. Not literally damn them to hell. Anyhow. You last statement is like in law enforcement. It is fustrating that there are people that do t like cops when they are out to protect people at least the good ones. But you don't here them complaining. Life just goes on. I am not you nor you are not me. You might not go public but I will blow the whistle. Now I am not saying that I would take default over that. But there are some freeware out there that I would just rather use default.
I have no idea what you are talking about. :P
There's something wrong when a minor group in the forum ruins the discussion. :-[
??? You realize the discussion was just another "let's all suggest our favorite airport" threads. They are bound to derail into something else.
-
I understand it is freeware. And damn them is just a figure of speech. Not literally damn them to hell. Anyhow. You last statement is like in law enforcement. It is fustrating that there are people that do t like cops when they are out to protect people at least the good ones. But you don't here them complaining. Life just goes on. I am not you nor you are not me. You might not go public but I will blow the whistle. Now I am not saying that I would take default over that. But there are some freeware out there that I would just rather use default.
Then how abot this. Until you put out something better, be mature about it and do something positive about it. Instead of pointing out something negative about someone else's scenery in another scenery team's forum, man up and suggest to Mach1 things that can make their scenery better. Otherwise, doing what you're doing makes you look like a fool to everyone else. Like I said, until you can put out something better than them, don't knock them.
BL.
-
Do I sound like I care? Why are you still on the subject?
-
Do I sound like I care? Why are you still on the subject?
You posted it, not I. This forum has nothing to do with Mach1. Why you even brought up Mach1, we don't know, nor doubt we will. But you could have handled it more maturely. But didn't. Oh well; c'est la guerre.
Now that you've upset quite a few people (as noted in this thread), you can now get back on topic. But as you said, you don't sound like you care. So why are you even here?
BL.
-
Go back and read. I was not the first person saying anything about Mach 1. I said damn Mach 1 and put in what sceneries I wouldn't mind seeing. But anyways forget it.....as I said before. I would rather see at least KIAH before Newark that area is congested with other fine add on sceneries to fly to in the meantime. Then KPHX, KDEN, KLAX, or even a KSLC. Then Newark. :)
-
Go back and read. I was not the first person saying anything about Mach 1. I said damn Mach 1 and put in what sceneries I wouldn't mind seeing. But anyways forget it.....as I said before. I would rather see at least KIAH before Newark that area is congested with other fine add on sceneries to fly to in the meantime. Then KPHX, KDEN, KLAX, or even a KSLC. Then Newark. :)
Not bad ideas!!! Although I have different list for what I like to see next. 8)
-
Oh I forgot KHOU
-
Oh I forgot KHOU
Seeing both Houston airports being done by FSDT would be EXCELLENT.For that matter might as well throw in there El Paso,Austin,etc.
A Texas series perhaps. :) 8)
-
Oh I forgot KHOU
Seeing both Houston airports being done by FSDT would be EXCELLENT.For that matter might as well throw in there El Paso,Austin,etc.
A Texas series perhaps. :) 8)
Rgr that.....We are on the same page...Yeah Texas series. Cause everything is big in Texas ;D
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
you're not the only one.. I don't fly much in Texas either, unless it is to/from some place that I know personally, like KPRX, or some unused field that people forget exist (because they only go to the big fields), like KBRO, KSPS, forgoing KIAH and KHOU for KGLS, etc.
BL.
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
you're not the only one.. I don't fly much in Texas either, unless it is to/from some place that I know personally, like KPRX, or some unused field that people forget exist (because they only go to the big fields), like KBRO, KSPS, forgoing KIAH and KHOU for KGLS, etc.
BL.
I have to admit I don't fly to Texas that often(I fly there often in real life though). Mainly on the account that there are not good sceneries (major airports) that are out that I could install. There is the Simflyers KDFW and KIAH but they dont sell the serials for them anymore. However when DFW comes out I will be flying to it all the time. Also Ft.Worth Center gets the most traffic on Vatsim.
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
you're not the only one.. I don't fly much in Texas either, unless it is to/from some place that I know personally, like KPRX, or some unused field that people forget exist (because they only go to the big fields), like KBRO, KSPS, forgoing KIAH and KHOU for KGLS, etc.
BL.
I have to admit I don't fly to Texas that often(I fly there often in real life though). Mainly on the account that there are not good sceneries (major airports) that are out that I could install. There is the Simflyers KDFW and KIAH but they dont sell the serials for them anymore. However when DFW comes out I will be flying to it all the time. Also Ft.Worth Center gets the most traffic on Vatsim.
You sure about that? As a VATSIM controller, I can pretty much safely say that ZFW doesn't get the most traffic on the entire network, let alone in N. America. I'm looking up the stats right now, but I'm pretty sure that it's evenly split between ZTL, ZNY, and ZLA. But you're right about Simflyers. I was using their KLAS scenery for the longest time, then just gave up on them.
BL.
-
I didn't mean that. I meant as far as Texas is concerned. Not entire Vatsim. :- ;)
I used there KLAS scenery to until FSDT came along. I didn't mind the KIAH other than no serial....but, oh well. :)
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
I hope its not the traffic.... :D
-
I understand it is freeware. And damn them is just a figure of speech. Not literally damn them to hell. Anyhow. You last statement is like in law enforcement. It is fustrating that there are people that do t like cops when they are out to protect people at least the good ones. But you don't here them complaining. Life just goes on. I am not you nor you are not me. You might not go public but I will blow the whistle. Now I am not saying that I would take default over that. But there are some freeware out there that I would just rather use default.
I have no idea what you are talking about. :P
There's something wrong when a minor group in the forum ruins the discussion. :-[
??? You realize the discussion was just another "let's all suggest our favorite airport" threads. They are bound to derail into something else.
That seems to happen alot ::)
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
Come on, you can say something better then that :D ;)
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
Come on, you can say something better then that :D ;)
I speak the truth. :D
-
Well in any case,two airports that been talked about in the threads alot are coming out soon by Orbx. KPDX and KSEA.
These two airports in the pacific northwest are going to be a great addition. Now we don't have to worry about FSDT doing either one of those any time soon. ;)
-
Well in any case,two airports that been talked about in the threads alot are coming out soon by Orbx. KPDX and KSEA.These two airports in the pacific northwest are going to be a great addition. Now we don't have to worry about FSDT doing either one of those any time soon.
ORBX generally does FSX only...Are they doing FS9 also?
-
These two airports in the pacific northwest are going to be a great addition. Now we don't have to worry about FSDT doing either one of those any time soon.
Those two airports will require NA Pacific Northwest be installed, and are for FSX only.
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
Beware of drivers with a Texan license plate...
-
These two airports in the pacific northwest are going to be a great addition. Now we don't have to worry about FSDT doing either one of those any time soon.
Those two airports will require NA Pacific Northwest be installed, and are for FSX only.
Thanks Bruce, that's exactly what I was thinking. I guess we're right back at trying to get FSDT's interest in it. ::)
-
There is no need for FSDT to waste time and money on KSea and KPDX. When someone else with great airport making skills are already making the two. Now we can focus our efforts on other airports that some have requested. Like KERW KIAH KHOU KSLC KLAX KDEN KPHX KMDW(for FSX) KABQ KJAX KMEM KSFO etc....
-
Well in any case,two airports that been talked about in the threads alot are coming out soon by Orbx. KPDX and KSEA.These two airports in the pacific northwest are going to be a great addition. Now we don't have to worry about FSDT doing either one of those any time soon.
ORBX generally does FSX only...Are they doing FS9 also?
No. No FS9. I think developers are starting to migrating from FS9 due to the advancement of technology. I know PMDG is for sure
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
Beware of drivers with a Texan license plate...
Hey now, Texans aren't bad drivers, at least not the majority I see on a daily basis in Dallas.
I've lived in California, Arizona and Texas, and I would have to say that overall the worst driving I have witnessed is in California. However, if you think the drivers are crazy in the US, go spend a few weeks down in Rio de Janeiro. That was about the scariest driving I have ever seen.
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
Thats only because of the current president.... his fault we are crazy.
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
Thats only because of the current president.... his fault we are crazy.
Lets not get political :D
-
I didnt know so many people flew to Texas in Flight Sim, I personally stay away from Texas... dont know why though... :P
Because Texans are CRAZY! :P :D
Beware of drivers with a Texan license plate...
Hey now, Texans aren't bad drivers, at least not the majority I see on a daily basis in Dallas.
I've lived in California, Arizona and Texas, and I would have to say that overall the worst driving I have witnessed is in California. However, if you think the drivers are crazy in the US, go spend a few weeks down in Rio de Janeiro. That was about the scariest driving I have ever seen.
I have lived in Cali, Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Colorado. And Cali does have the worst drivers. Out of my list.
-
I think Boston drivers will rival anyone else for that 'Worst Drivers in the U.S.' title. We also have the benefit of screwed up roads that make no sense at all and roads without signs.
-
But thanks to Fly Tampa, you're represented very nicely in the simulator world. Being a New Englander, it's one of my favorite airports to fly. ;)
-
I live in NE Ohio and for the most part we mostly have nice drivers on the road.
-
Did you guys forget about New Jersy? ;D
-
Did you guys forget about New Jersy? ;D
No...but no one cares about New Jersey. :P
-
Let's change the thread to "What state has the worst driver?" :D
-
NO NO NO,just keep this thread on scenery suggestions. In any case I have another airport I would like to see,KMSY New Orleans. :)
-
NO NO NO,just keep this thread on scenery suggestions. In any case I have another airport I would like to see,KMSY New Orleans. :)
I think Aerosoft has something already
-
Fsdreamtem Please Can you Make LFPG as Scenery.Its an Beautiful Airport And has the best Route on The World,and that Route is LFPG-EGLL,EGLL-LFPG Please Fsdreamteam the Aerosoft Mega Airprot CDG and Heathrow isnt so good like your Products.All that wanna see Fsdreamteam Paris Charle De Gaulle Should Say.LFPG4ever
-
Fsdreamtem Please Can you Make LFPG as Scenery.
I don't understand - what's wrong with the one from Sim-Wings and Aerosoft? ???
-
I think Aerosoft has something already
Except for Chicago, Aerosoft's MegaCities do NOT add any airport enhancement, and even that is a very minor enhancement of the default O'Hare and Midway. Only airport added was Meigs.
-
Fsdreamtem Please Can you Make LFPG as Scenery.
I don't understand - what's wrong with the one from Sim-Wings and Aerosoft? ???
Nothings wrong with Heathrow ???
-
LFPG is Charles de Gaulle, not Heathrow. ;D
-
LFPG is Charles de Gaulle, not Heathrow
He said that both Heathrow and CDG from Aerosoft are not good.
We don't agree to this, which is why we don't have any plans to do any of them, regardless of the fact that we *might* do something better, it doesn't matter, they are just too new to be redone and to ask lot of people to repurchase them so early.
-
LFPG is Charles de Gaulle, not Heathrow
He said that both Heathrow and CDG from Aerosoft are not good.
We don't agree to this, which is why we don't have any plans to do any of them, regardless of the fact that we *might* do something better, it doesn't matter, they are just too new to be redone and to ask lot of people to repurchase them so early.
I would have to agree. :-*
-
same here
-
no i dont say Heathrow Is bad I read in an Review that the Gate Textures Are not so Sharp And the Cargo Areas are bad.Heathrow is good but i want LFPG
-
no i dont say Heathrow Is bad I read in an Review that the Gate Textures Are not so Sharp And the Cargo Areas are bad.Heathrow is good but i want LFPG
Are you speaking of the Aerosoft/Simwings version or the UK2K version? The Simwings version has exceptional textures. From the terminals to the ramp, taxiways, and in my opinion the best runway textures in FS9. LFPG is also in the same class.
-
the Mega Aiport Paris CDG scenery i Mean i had speaked About The Simwing/Aerosoft Scenery????I read in an Review that the Gate Textures Are not so Shape And the Cargor Area is bad,is that really true???
PS:I mean in The LFPG scenery
-
I'll try to throw this one out there,KDSM;Des Moines International Airport. ;)
-
San Francisco Needs a good scenery for fsx!!! KSFO is in the hearts of many airplane lovers.
-
San Francisco Needs a good scenery for fsx!!! KSFO is in the hearts of many airplane lovers.
Don't forget Denver
-
Any thoughts on a Detroit scenery?
-
Any thoughts on a Detroit scenery?
I guess Detriot is not bad. But not in demand as the others listed.
-
Detroit should be considered since it was Northwest airlines hub now of course Delta. San Francisco, as a major hub for United, has maint. hanger their. It would be a tremendous idea to the airport as it provides connections to domestic and international destinations. Both airports would be a great to see in FSX. :)
-
Detroit should be considered since it was Northwest airlines hub now of course Delta. San Francisco, as a major hub for United, has maint. hanger their. It would be a tremendous idea to the airport as it provides connections to domestic and international destinations. Both airports would be a great to see in FSX. :)
Denver I think is a bigger hub than San Fran..The pilots train here. :)
-
Didn't ImagineSim do Denver?
-
Didn't ImagineSim do Denver?
they did but it is only for fs2004
-
Denver would be a great package from FSDT but the SFO default scenery for fsx drives me nuts, because it is soooo lame!!
-
Didn't ImagineSim do Denver?
They did but it is kinda out dated and not really all that great. Would be nice if FSDT were able to do one...But if they don't I will be real happy with the FTX/Orbix version after seeing their work
-
Hello
Montreal for me is that I'd like to have as a project on the list of fsdreamteam
thanks Didier Chabanne
-
...I will be real happy with the FTX/Orbix version after seeing their work
What version? The FTX planned release page says nothing about Denver.
-
...I will be real happy with the FTX/Orbix version after seeing their work
What version? The FTX planned release page says nothing about Denver.
they are doing the entire Rocky Mountain region which almost certainly will include Denver and perhaps Aspen. Just like they did Pacific Northwest along with Seattle.
-
Hello
Denver why not me I will be after Montreal CYUL ;D
thanks Didier Chabanne
-
Hello
Denver why not me I will be after Montreal CYUL ;D
thanks Didier Chabanne
What about you? ???
-
I said that Denver would be nice but it'll be to see before and after Montreal
Denver like scenery .
thanks Didier Chabanne
-
I said that Denver would be nice but it'll be to see before and after Montreal
Denver like scenery .
thanks Didier Chabanne
What do you mean,"...it'll be to see..."? What does that mean?
-
It would be nice to see someone do Denver International Airport ::) Montreal possibly being done byFSDT sometime down the road would be great as well ::) ;)
-
It would be nice to see someone due Denver International Airport
Someone did Denver International. ;D
-
It would be nice to see someone due Denver International Airport
Someone did Denver International. ;D
I know,simflyer and imaginesim.However I am saying I like to see it done by FSDT if that's possibe down the line. :)
-
It would be nice to see someone due Denver International Airport
Someone did Denver International. ;D
Yeah those two versions of DIA are old news
-
All the more reason to see something new ;)
-
It would be nice to see someone do Denver International Airport ::) Montreal possibly being done byFSDT sometime down the road would be great as well ::) ;)
Thanks for clearing that up ;D
-
Your welcome. I would like to see Toronto Pearson and Vancouver sometime down the line as well. :)
-
One can wonder if Flytampa will remodel the KSEA and KSFO for fs9/X? Does anyone know that?
-
Im down for toronto pearson! it needs to be done badly. Im pretty sure Vancouvers being done, freeware even. not sure the website though.
-
Im down for toronto pearson! it needs to be done badly. Im pretty sure Vancouvers being done, freeware even. not sure the website though.
http://jgabbert.wordpress.com/
-
ah yes, thanks newmanix
-
no worries. ;)
-
One can wonder if Flytampa will remodel the KSEA and KSFO for fs9/X? Does anyone know that?
YES!!! I am dying for a SFO scenery, i need a payware scenery for my home airport!!!
-
SFO has been on my list of airports I would like to see done.
-
I wouldn't be shocked if they make KSFO, they have already redone KBOS, and are putting the finishing touches on Vienna for FSX. Quite frankly, I wouldn't be shocked if all of their airports were being redone into fsx
-
Someone needs to redo KDEN
-
Someone needs to redo KDEN
Any hints of who would redo KDEN???? :-*
-
Someone needs to redo KDEN
Any hints of who would redo KDEN???? :-*
Hint no. But would be nice if FSDT or Fly Tampa. However FTX/Orbix is doing the entire Rocky Mountian region. So I'm guessing that they will do the airport as well. But for others that do not have a steller PC might get rapped on the FPS.
-
Someone needs to redo KDEN
Any hints of who would redo KDEN???? :-*
Hint no. But would be nice if FSDT or Fly Tampa. However FTX/Orbix is doing the entire Rocky Mountian region. So I'm guessing that they will do the airport as well. But for others that do not have a steller PC might get rapped on the FPS.
It will probably be 2012 before we ever see the ORBX Rockies area, then 2013 until they do KDEN. Heck they said it wont be until next year before KSEA or KPDX is out. I wish they (ORBX) and FSDT had larger staffs of modelers and texture artists so they could crank out sceneries faster. I'm sure if they could make the sceneries quicker there would be a market for them. Frankly, I would by just about any US airports that they would develope, I just hate having to wait years in advance for them.
-
no kidding :P Its pretty much the same thing for an example KMDW needs to be remade. It should never take anything less then common sense with FSX,ALL the major airports should be done(US).
Alot of them brings tremdous depth for air traffic and are fun to fly into.
-
That would be great for them to add more staff, BUT, their small staff is part of the reason they are so good. If they get to big of a staff, quality might go down, and I personally don't think quality should be sacrificed for quantity
-
That would be great for them to add more staff, BUT, their small staff is part of the reason they are so good. If they get to big of a staff, quality might go down, and I personally don't think quality should be sacrificed for quantity
I second that
-
That would be great for them to add more staff, BUT, their small staff is part of the reason they are so good. If they get to big of a staff, quality might go down, and I personally don't think quality should be sacrificed for quantity
Quailty always should be a priority for any developer. ;)
-
That would be great for them to add more staff, BUT, their small staff is part of the reason they are so good. If they get to big of a staff, quality might go down, and I personally don't think quality should be sacrificed for quantity
When I made that comment I made it assuming that if they had a larger staff and the qaulity remained the same, then obviously it would be a good thing if they could produce the same quality of airports in less time. Of course I would prefer they remain small if that is what it would take for them maintain the same level of workmanship.