KLAX

[Frank Lindberg]

Mine is set to about 90 % otherwise I agree with you. I hate long queues. 

[SirIsaac726]

Also, get AI Smooth (not sure if it is available for FSX?).

[data63]

Simply: heavy metal commercial aviation flying is better in FS9....., easier to run 100% AI on big airports.

What happens if you turn AI down to 80% or 90% at big airports, does it ruin the flight if it's not set to 100%?

I usually set UT2 Traffic to 80% and an airport like LAX, LHR or FRA is pretty crowded - 100% would be some kind of "overkill" as FSX/FS9 are not able to move aircraft to other parking position for long term parking.

Happy Landings

Juergen

[sonebone]

I keep checking arrivals for KLAX for FS9 and the board still shows delayed. You said from my original post that it will be landing in a couple of days. It has yet to arrive. As you know its never easy to sit and wait for an anticipated arrival. Can you give me a more updated arrival time, or should I just go buy another magazine and sit and wait?

[sonebone]

Also can we keep this thread to the arrival time of KLAX FS9 and not divert to ai traffic....Thank you.

[duckbilled]

Also can we keep this thread to the arrival time of KLAX FS9 and not divert to ai traffic....Thank you.

That being said, I have started to use the UT2 FPS target option since with LAX. My 100% UT2 does not fly with LAX. I think, however, it has less to do with aircraft on the ground and more to do with aircraft in the air and at other airports. I think I will have to do some testing over the weekend to find a sweet spot.

I have always had better FPS at KATL and EGLL than I have at LAX or JFK. I'm thinking that since LAX and NYC have some of the busiest airspace in the world, there must be more to the FPS issue than the aircraft sitting at the gates. I need to figure out a better way to manage all of the traffic that is not at LAX's gates. Any ideas?