Firstly, as your paying customer I do not appreciate your tone and being spoken to in that manner
I don't see any "tone" and don't understand what do you mean with "that manner", my post was simply illustrating the cold hard fact, that you haven't read the entire thread, otherwise you wouldn't started this argument in the first place.
Yes I agree you made it clear as to the reason why you're not posting screenshot my point is the bluntness as to the way it was explained
Again, you got it all wrong, which just confirms what I've said (you haven't read all the posts):
THESE are my posts explaining the lack of screenshots:http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php?topic=7058.msg59834#msg59834http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php?topic=7058.msg59853#msg59853
They are BOTH entirely technical, so you are wrong stating that the lack of screenshots was "explained with bluntness".
THEN, you might have been confused by ANOTHER reply:
We announce what we announce, when we decide it's time to announce it...
Which might be classified as being blunt, but that wasn't a reply to the issue you raised (the *reason* we haven't posted CYVR screenshots), but it's just a reply related to what the OTHER (not the CYVR! ) developing team was doing, so this is an entirely different issue, which is discussions about UNANNOUNCED products.
CYVR HAS been officially announced, so it's ok to ask about its status and replies about the lack of screenshot were fully circumstantiated, as my previous post clearly shows.
But comments about products not yet announced, can't be replied other than with a "no-comment" statement, because we reserve the right (as anybody else does) to not to give any explanation on these.
That's why you were wrong: you confused the "blunt reply" following a request to comment on unannounced product, as being in any way related to the issue of the lack of screenshot in CYVR which, as I've said, if you care to read the thread carefully, would have been apparent, as I've explained now.