|
virtuali
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2012, 01:56:35 PM » |
|
The advantage of having a platform around for several years, is that forces developers into creative thinking trying to overcome its limitations.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
windshear
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: February 22, 2012, 04:19:48 PM » |
|
I watched some of Justplanes' Air Canada 77L DVD and the approach and take off from Vancouver was so interesting! Can't wait either! Check out the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_llyS20J0AcI really hope you would consider doing Sydney! The video has a lot of terminal shots, if you buy the DVD you'll get a lot of detail. But until then I can't wait to fly Westjet in and out of YVR! Flights to Honolulu and Maui sure will be interesting!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 26, 2012, 12:01:59 PM by windshear »
|
Logged
|
Yours truly Boaz Fraizer Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
|
|
Lindbergh72
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2012, 10:47:10 PM » |
|
I watched some of Justplanes' Air Canada 77L DVD and the approach and take off from Vancouver was so interesting! Can't wait either! Check out the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_llyS20J0AcI really hope you would consider doing Sydney! The video has a lot of terminal shots, if you buy the DVD you'll get a lot of detail. But until then I can't wait to fly Westjet in and out of YVR! Flights to Honolulu and Maui sure will be interesting! Great video, thanks :-) LUV the 777
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smokeyupahead
Newbie

Posts: 41
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: March 10, 2012, 12:55:19 PM » |
|
I've been looking for a good quality Canadian airport for fsx and a bigger airport in the Orbx PNW, compared to the smaller fields they released so far.
This is gonna be amazing!
David DD
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DMA-GA790FX, PHENOM 965BE @ 4.0GHZ (cooling by Noctua NH-C14), ATI 6870, 6GIGS DDR2, W764BIT, FSX DELUXE (bojote's cfg. fix, uiautomationcore fix). TRACKIR and EZDOK, REX2, ORBX, PMDG, CARENADO, FSDREAMTEAM, FLYTAMPA AND SHADE INSTEAD OF ENB SERIES (that fixed once and for all the directx crahes).
|
|
|
|
JamesChams
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: March 13, 2012, 01:12:16 AM » |
|
The advantage of having a platform around for several years, is that forces developers into creative thinking trying to overcome its limitations.
Virtuali, Well, I'm glad to see that its been more than just my *nagging* that got you guys to put this out of your "development drawers"  ... After seeing these textures and that of the KLAX's package, i must ask; can you get Chicago's O'Hare X's ground textures to look as good as this as well? All that's needed next is to wait for the payware version of GSX along with its add-on goodies (Bush, military, etc.) to complete these tremendous circle of upgrades and we're in business. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Walk with the wise and become wise; associate with fools and get in trouble.” (Prov.13:20 NIV) Thank you very much. Sincerely, From, James F. Chams
|
|
|
|
virtuali
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: March 13, 2012, 11:00:52 AM » |
|
After seeing these textures and that of the KLAX's package, i must ask; can you get Chicago's O'Hare X's ground textures to look as good as this as well? Everything can obviously made, it's not that the Chicago area would prevent to create high quality textures. But it's likely we'll do KJFK first. All that's needed next is to wait for the payware version of GSX along with its add-on goodies (Bush, military, etc.) to complete these tremendous circle of upgrades and we're in business.  The military theme is surely of great interest, but we believe a General Aviation and a Cargo theme should come first.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
windshear
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: March 13, 2012, 07:06:15 PM » |
|
That's funny, I have kind of always liked your ORD's ground textures! Now after the update it looks really nice!
But JFK needs some updated ground textures, so that sounds great!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yours truly Boaz Fraizer Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
rickcyvr
Newbie

Posts: 26
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2012, 05:12:04 AM » |
|
Any more teasers for us?  sorry for harping, just really excited.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
virtuali
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2012, 01:08:10 PM » |
|
Any more teasers for us?  sorry for harping, just really excited. This is something we had to explain every time a new scenery is announced. After the first base ground layout, were we can post meaningful screenshots, it comes the long and boring part of adding taxilines, ground details, vertical signs, etc. that aren't really useful for exciting screenshots and this phase might last even a couple of months. So, invariably, after the first screenshots are published, there's a long waiting time between the next screenshots, which usually come after we start the main 3d modeling, were people start asking why we haven't published any screenshots, so we need to come out with this explanation...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
windshear
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: April 01, 2012, 03:10:38 PM » |
|
I think people just want to request a "Sign of life" from you  Good to hear you are hard at work 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yours truly Boaz Fraizer Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
|
Vanzunator
Newbie

Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: April 01, 2012, 04:01:45 PM » |
|
As a Vancouverite who flies into/out of YVR a few times every month and a simmer based out of YVR, I can hardly wait for this add-on. If FSDT’s other recent airports is any indication of what we can expect from this project, this can be the best add-on I’ll ever buy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Hamilton
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: April 01, 2012, 04:52:42 PM » |
|
I think people just want to request a "Sign of life" from you How about cutting Umberto a break? They don't use Instant Scenery, it takes a good nine months to do a large airport.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Intel Core i7-2600 Sandy Bridge 3.40GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB GeForce 8800GTX
|
|
|
flysiu
Newbie

Posts: 10
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: April 01, 2012, 07:13:33 PM » |
|
Gentlemen,
Just out of curiosity, when you guys talk about updating ORD and JFK, how extensive of an upgrade are we talking? More specifically, the new 'technique' FSDT employed with KLAX that allowed a severe reduction in the number of BGLs required is just short of a godsend for FSX. I'm still amazed at how well LAX runs on my computer, even with the NGx, UT, etc. It's the fastest airport I have despite being one of the larger and busier ones, it's also the nicest looking. Given the success of this method I am assuming it will be employed with Vancouver and all other projects going forward. But when it comes to the existing sceneries such as ORD and JFK, will they be completely torn down and rebuilt using this new method or are talking more about simply some textures upgrades? The thought of having ORD and JFK (which already run very well) run with the speed of LAX is a very exciting possibility.
Thanks guys.
-lou
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rickcyvr
Newbie

Posts: 26
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: April 02, 2012, 02:30:15 AM » |
|
Any more teasers for us?  sorry for harping, just really excited. This is something we had to explain every time a new scenery is announced. After the first base ground layout, were we can post meaningful screenshots, it comes the long and boring part of adding taxilines, ground details, vertical signs, etc. that aren't really useful for exciting screenshots and this phase might last even a couple of months. So, invariably, after the first screenshots are published, there's a long waiting time between the next screenshots, which usually come after we start the main 3d modeling, were people start asking why we haven't published any screenshots, so we need to come out with this explanation... Understood. My apologies. Just excited about this one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|