Author Topic: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%  (Read 22281 times)

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50691
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« on: April 16, 2008, 11:34:56 pm »
Just to show what our O'Hare scenery in FSX can do:

skAI Traffic Package in FSX with 100% density! And note: this is an FS9 traffic package, we think that something exported with the FSX SDK might do even better. Frame rate is still very usable.

Please, use the scrollbars to see the whole image, because it's 1600x1200.



[attachment deleted by admin]

thepilot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2008, 01:42:56 pm »
With cloudy weather, framerates will drop to 12...

_Dre_

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2008, 01:58:45 pm »
What are the computer specs please?
Andre-FS9
AES Super User.





virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50691
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2008, 03:28:19 pm »
What are the computer specs please?

It's a PC that wasn't even top of the line (just the graphic card, perhaps) in the summer of 2006, when it was bought, Core 2 Duo 2.66 mhz, 4GB, nVidia 8800 GTX, Vista SP1 32 bit. No overclock at all, I even forgot to defrag the hdd and, under XP, fps would probably be faster as well.

You can buy a Quad for less than half of the price today, and the new 9800 has roughly the same performances or even better, at half of the price.

_Dre_

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2008, 03:32:01 pm »
Thanks.
Andre-FS9
AES Super User.





virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50691
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2008, 03:43:06 pm »
With cloudy weather, framerates will drop to 12...

Doesn't happen here:

22.1 fps is with Overcast cloud and no rain.
20.2 fps is with rain
19.3 fps is with Thunderstorms

[attachment deleted by admin]

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50691
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2008, 03:50:27 pm »
See what's happening at 50% AI: some guys have disappeared, of course, but still is quite pleasant to look at, at 30 FPS!

[attachment deleted by admin]

axiom13

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2008, 04:47:13 pm »
what are your display settings in FSX? I have a Nvidia GTX 7900, 4 gb ram, 3.80 ghz Intel Core Duo Processor, Vista 64 bit, and i can barely get 4 fps with traffic at 30%. all my settings are at medium high.

axiom

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50691
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2008, 05:16:58 pm »
I've posted my settings in the Greystone thread, you can simply load them, and try what's happening on your system.

Note that the AI package I'm using, although it has been made for FS9 (so it might even improve, should the various developers release native FSX models), it's very well done and optimized for fps.

My settings are quite high but, there are some settings you can put very high, without noticeable impact on fps, others that need to be carefully weighted.

For example, under DX9 you shouldn't use Bloom, because it eats up half of the frame rate. At KORD, there's no much need to use Water 2.0, "1.0 high" it's just fine. But, even if you want to use shader 2.0 for Water, I don't see the point of putting too high, the quality increase is slim, but the fps impact is high.

Since we have custom AI ground vehicles at KORD, I simply put the default to 0%. I had 100% (or 50% in the last screen) for airlines and GA traffic only.

Autogen was at Dense (so, 2 notches down from maximum), because I find that it draws more or less the same autogen that FS9 at Extremely Dense. Scenery complexity is at Dense as well, because I can live with the fact that not *all* buildings in Chicago downtown are shown, but "just" most of them.

Settings are meant to be used, depending on the kind of flight you want to do, location, airplane used, weather, etc. They are not a "fire and forget" thing, that you can set once and never touch again. That's probably why MS added an option to load and save settings, so you can create a set of them, depending on the situation.

At Greystone, for example, I can easily crank almost everything to the right, and still getting a good frame rate.

However, your 4 fps looks a little bit suspicious, especially with Vista 64 and 4GB and, especially, with a 3.80 Core Duo processor!! I'm not sure if it's the videocard your bottleneck, before telling you to go out and buy a 9800 (same or better performances than the 8800 GTX, half price), I would check also your whole system config, Windows optimization like turning off unneeded processes and background programs.

For example, since I'm not using the PC for internet, email and basically everything else except flight sim (I'm a Mac user for all the rest), I don't use any firewall or any resident antivirus. If I need to scan a suspicious file, I turn on the antivirus on the fly, then I turn if off.

I also turned off all the annoying Vista background services, like automatic Defrag, Boot optimization, File Indexing, Windows Defender and even the Aero interface...

There's also the issue of several "tweaks" that were commonly used in FS9 and FSX up to SP1 (like the Texture Bandwidth Multiplier), that in SP2, if set with the same settings as in FS9, results in worse performances. You might want to try fresh, moving your FSX.CFG away, and let FSX create one from scratch.

thepilot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2008, 05:38:16 pm »
Frame rates look ok but I see a loss of quality (if it's not due to resizing...)

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50691
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2008, 05:39:58 pm »
Frame rates look ok but I see a loss of quality (if it's not due to resizing...)

It's all due to compression: the original BMP at 1600x1200, 32 bit uncompressed it's 5 MB, not a 150K JPG as I've posted.

« Last Edit: April 17, 2008, 05:41:45 pm by virtuali »

thepilot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2008, 05:44:23 pm »
I dunno, but my frame rates always drop when it's cloudy (FE textures).
21 frames are pretty OK but I think I wouldn't achieve it.

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50691
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #12 on: April 17, 2008, 06:02:58 pm »
Here's another one, resized to 800x600, but using PNG lossless compression. It's slightly sharpened in Photoshop, to make up for the resizing from 1600x1200 to 800x600.

Traffic at 50%, but still pretty crowded, plenty of Autogen, Clouds with Rain and Thuderstorms.

Alright, I give you the secret: airplane shadows are turned off. That alone, with so many AI, impacts for 7 fps. However, I would be at 22-23 in the same spot.




[attachment deleted by admin]

axiom13

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #13 on: April 18, 2008, 02:27:11 am »
i can only et 20 fps with all traffic off, and scenery complexity at sparse, that means no jetways. As soon as I bump up scenery complexity or turn on traffic at 30% fps drops to 4. I know my specs are good, i don't feel like they are working.

axiom
« Last Edit: April 19, 2008, 08:08:24 pm by axiom13 »

Razgriz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 699
Re: O'Hare in FSX with AI traffic at 100%
« Reply #14 on: April 18, 2008, 09:15:24 pm »
Alright, I give you the secret: airplane shadows are turned off. That alone, with so many AI, impacts for 7 fps. However, I would be at 22-23 in the same spot.

Mine looked crappy and not on with anti aliasing so I decided to turn it off one day and i was like WOW!  I found that out by chance.  I'll check out shadows on the ground and others.