Ok, thanks for that, I'll take a look.
An observation and feedback. What I found so great with Zurich was it really shows off what FSX can do, and in my view set a new benchmark in FSX scenery that quite frankly crapped all over everything else currently available. To be honest I find you guys wanting to make O'Hare look more like the FS9 version to be disappointing given the very high standard you set with Zurich.
As a consumer I'm looking for scenery that looks like it belongs in FSX, and I would have thought O'Hare offers plenty of scope to do this given the glass frontages on all the terminals etc. If the FSX version doesn't differentiate and really show the power and visual gains made possible in X, why would people bother upgrading to X?
I certainly respect the work you guys are doing so this isnt a criticism, just my view of the FSX world for whatever its worth. Keep up the great work.