Author Topic: LAX  (Read 94447 times)

Frank Lindberg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 746
Re: LAX
« Reply #135 on: September 20, 2011, 03:54:40 pm »
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

Great news..  :) We can live with it  :D I'm sure it will look super... Just like DFW
VA. Senior Captain Frank Lindberg
"United we stand and divided we fall"
My PC spec: MS Win10 pro 64 bit - Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ OC to 5.0 GHz - 16GB Ram - Geforce 2080TI 11GBVRAM - P3Dv5.1

Dimon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
Re: LAX
« Reply #136 on: September 20, 2011, 03:57:53 pm »
Thank you, folks.

Obviously, we do not expect all this fancy-shmancy stuff from FSX and we're well prepared for the reasonable sacrifice in FS2004 (i'm not even sure that a word "sacrifice" is properly chosen). Honestly speaking, I'm pretty much happy with old C9 KLAX except for the lack of AES. Moreover, I'm still using C9 EHAM instead of crappy EHAM of other developer.

Bottom line: the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder
i7-6700k@4.6Ghz, Z170 Delux, 980Ti-6GB5700, 2TB EVO850, 16GB DDR4 RAM Win7/64 PRO.

Frank Lindberg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 746
Re: LAX
« Reply #137 on: September 20, 2011, 04:17:54 pm »
Thank you, folks.

Obviously, we do not expect all this fancy-shmancy stuff from FSX and we're well prepared for the reasonable sacrifice in FS2004 (i'm not even sure that a word "sacrifice" is properly chosen). Honestly speaking, I'm pretty much happy with old C9 KLAX except for the lack of AES. Moreover, I'm still using C9 EHAM instead of crappy EHAM of other developer.

Bottom line: the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder

Yes and since we spend more time in the air and less time on the ground, we can go on with good compromise. Most importing thing is AES compatible!  Sorry guys, U can't recommend me BP  ;D
VA. Senior Captain Frank Lindberg
"United we stand and divided we fall"
My PC spec: MS Win10 pro 64 bit - Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ OC to 5.0 GHz - 16GB Ram - Geforce 2080TI 11GBVRAM - P3Dv5.1

CngDelta757

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: LAX
« Reply #138 on: September 20, 2011, 05:28:01 pm »
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

Beautiful!!! Yeah I succumbed to the FSX version and I am pleased with the FPS... great work and my apologies for my rage  ;)

keino333

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
Re: LAX
« Reply #139 on: September 20, 2011, 08:13:11 pm »
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

Great news..  :) We can live with it  :D I'm sure it will look super... Just like DFW

Ditto....I happy and smiling...and and shall graciously wait..
Thanks for the News Umberto....

CngDelta757

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: LAX
« Reply #140 on: September 20, 2011, 11:00:32 pm »
I purchased O'hare for FS9 and got the FSX one too included... Will that be available for LAX if an FS9 version comes along?

Ray

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: LAX
« Reply #141 on: September 20, 2011, 11:01:23 pm »
Thank you very much Umberto for that update on a possible FS9 version. Keeping the fingers crossed it will work out! Again, thank you for your efforts!

newmanix

  • Beta tester
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 753
Re: LAX
« Reply #142 on: September 21, 2011, 04:54:16 am »
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

 :) :D ;D :o 8) :-* YAYYYYYY!!!!!!! Great news!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHOO HOO!!!!!!  ;D ;D

May I also ask how LSZH update is coming along too??

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46949
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: LAX
« Reply #143 on: September 21, 2011, 06:38:43 am »
May I also ask how LSZH update is coming along too??

That one will come in time for the new Terminal B opening.

global express

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
Re: LAX
« Reply #144 on: September 21, 2011, 11:37:35 am »
Excellent!  ;D

May I ask, is Fabrizio still working on a Geneva update? I spoke with him in May and he said he would start as soon as the Hawaii airports were finished, but since then, he hasn't replied to any of my messages (I offered to help with pictures etc)...

Would be nice to hear how things are progressing, if possible.

Many thanks,
Alex

Fiedman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: LAX
« Reply #145 on: September 23, 2011, 07:59:36 am »
Will There be an FS9 version?

Frank Lindberg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 746
Re: LAX
« Reply #146 on: September 23, 2011, 08:07:40 am »
Will There be an FS9 version?

Maybe... he will be testing it I guess.
VA. Senior Captain Frank Lindberg
"United we stand and divided we fall"
My PC spec: MS Win10 pro 64 bit - Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ OC to 5.0 GHz - 16GB Ram - Geforce 2080TI 11GBVRAM - P3Dv5.1

SirIsaac726

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 645
Re: LAX
« Reply #147 on: September 23, 2011, 05:35:59 pm »
Will There be an FS9 version?

This question has been answered countless times.  Take a read through and you'll find that it is uncertain but Umberto did reveal optimism.

Dimon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
Re: LAX
« Reply #148 on: September 27, 2011, 01:52:44 pm »
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

Good morning Umberto,

Anything new to share with us regarding the progress of FS2004 version of LAX? Sorry for my impatience, but I guess asking this question once a week wouldn't be considered as extreme persistence. ;D

Thank you!
Dmitriy
i7-6700k@4.6Ghz, Z170 Delux, 980Ti-6GB5700, 2TB EVO850, 16GB DDR4 RAM Win7/64 PRO.

virtuali

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46949
    • VIRTUALI Sagl
Re: LAX
« Reply #149 on: September 27, 2011, 02:00:56 pm »
We are working on it.