LAX

[Thralni]

That looks truly great. I doubt my computer is going to like it, but it sure looks good. When it comes out, I'll be doing KLAX-KLAS-KLAX first thing! Then perhaps KSFO-KLAX-KSFO.

[duckbilled]

Release imminent? Wife will be out of town all day Saturday and Saturday night. It sure would be nice to have some FSDT LAX to keep me occupied.

[VX4ever]

That looks truly great. I doubt my computer is going to like it, but it sure looks good. When it comes out, I'll be doing KLAX-KLAS-KLAX first thing! Then perhaps KSFO-KLAX-KSFO.

Same here, KLAX-KSFO in my American Airlines NGX! 

[PUP4ORD]

KSFO-KLAX-KORD,KLAX-KSFO-KORD,KORD-KSFO-KLAX,KORD-KLAX-KSFO......Hmm that would be fun.

[01pewterz28]

I feel some DEN-LAX, ORD-LAX, MCO-LAX LAX-LAS-SFO-LAX-LAS runs coming

[pmrose]

Virtuali, you may want to jump in before this gets out of hand if LAX is not released this weekend.......Or is it?

Paul

[virtuali]

Virtuali, you may want to jump in before this gets out of hand if LAX is not released this weekend.......Or is it?

Surely this weekend, most likely today

[laxclipper]

 

FSDT Thank you, thank you...

Definately A great weekend to send the wife to her mother's...

[Dimon]

Virtuali, you may want to jump in before this gets out of hand if LAX is not released this weekend.......Or is it?

Surely this weekend, most likely today

Any word regarding FS2004 status?

[virtuali]

Any word regarding FS2004 status?

We haven't even started thinking about it and, as it is now, we don't have much faith it can be done, we just made some informal discussions internally.

It's not only a matter of accepting a reduced resolution for FS9 (since it doesn't support the 4096x4096 textures we used), is that we also surpassed, by far, the maximum polygonal limit of the FS9 compiler, which means we would have to work for months splitting the scenery in smaller parts and retexturing it, losing both the optimization and our time, which would be much better spent doing another FSX product.

[WillClark]

AMAZING CAN'T wait... SFO to LAX and back or to LAS....!

[B777ER]

Any word regarding FS2004 status?

We haven't even started thinking about it and, as it is now, we don't have much faith it can be done, we just made some informal discussions internally.

It's not only a matter of accepting a reduced resolution for FS9 (since it doesn't support the 4096x4096 textures we used), is that we also surpassed, by far, the maximum polygonal limit of the FS9 compiler, which means we would have to work for months splitting the scenery in smaller parts and retexturing it, losing both the optimization and our time, which would be much better spent doing another FSX product.

Good. Agree 100% that your time would be better spent working on the next FSX title rather than stopping forward progress to work months on a 8 year old platform for little gain. I hope this is the path you all choose and finally let go with FS9. I look forward to LAX and the next FSX title after that one.

[global express]

We haven't even started thinking about it and, as it is now, we don't have much faith it can be done, we just made some informal discussions internally.

It's not only a matter of accepting a reduced resolution for FS9 (since it doesn't support the 4096x4096 textures we used), is that we also surpassed, by far, the maximum polygonal limit of the FS9 compiler, which means we would have to work for months splitting the scenery in smaller parts and retexturing it, losing both the optimization and our time, which would be much better spent doing another FSX product.

That's such a shame. Sounds like my time as an FSDT customer has come to an end, a sad day for the hundreds of FS9 users that were all looking forward to purchasing LAX.

[aircanadajet]

Oh Dear! I can't believe it!!!!!!! I've been waiting for sooooo long for this.

[Anders Bermann]

Any word regarding FS2004 status?

We haven't even started thinking about it and, as it is now, we don't have much faith it can be done, we just made some informal discussions internally.

It's not only a matter of accepting a reduced resolution for FS9 (since it doesn't support the 4096x4096 textures we used), is that we also surpassed, by far, the maximum polygonal limit of the FS9 compiler, which means we would have to work for months splitting the scenery in smaller parts and retexturing it, losing both the optimization and our time, which would be much better spent doing another FSX product.

Hmm sad regarding the FS9 status... However I fully understand your position!
Looking forward to release!
(I personally have moved to FSX, since the PMDG 737NG)