FSDreamTeam forum
January 19, 2020, 01:36:05 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11
  Print  
Author Topic: LAX  (Read 59790 times)
Dimon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 481



« Reply #135 on: September 20, 2011, 03:20:31 PM »

So....what are the chances of FS2004 version as of today, September 20th, 2011?
Logged

i7-6700k@4.6Ghz, Z170 Delux, 980Ti-6GB5700, 2TB EVO850, 16GB DDR4 RAM Win7/64 PRO.
virtuali
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 37430



WWW
« Reply #136 on: September 20, 2011, 03:50:21 PM »

I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...
Logged

Lindbergh72
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 745



« Reply #137 on: September 20, 2011, 03:54:40 PM »

I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

Great news..  Smiley We can live with it  Cheesy I'm sure it will look super... Just like DFW
Logged

VA. Captain Frank Rose
"United we stand and divided we fall"
My PC spec: MS Win10 pro 64 bit - Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ OC to 5.0 GHz - 16GB Ram - Geforce 1080TI 11GBVRAM - P3Dv4.3
Dimon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 481



« Reply #138 on: September 20, 2011, 03:57:53 PM »

Thank you, folks.

Obviously, we do not expect all this fancy-shmancy stuff from FSX and we're well prepared for the reasonable sacrifice in FS2004 (i'm not even sure that a word "sacrifice" is properly chosen). Honestly speaking, I'm pretty much happy with old C9 KLAX except for the lack of AES. Moreover, I'm still using C9 EHAM instead of crappy EHAM of other developer.

Bottom line: the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder
Logged

i7-6700k@4.6Ghz, Z170 Delux, 980Ti-6GB5700, 2TB EVO850, 16GB DDR4 RAM Win7/64 PRO.
Lindbergh72
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 745



« Reply #139 on: September 20, 2011, 04:17:54 PM »

Thank you, folks.

Obviously, we do not expect all this fancy-shmancy stuff from FSX and we're well prepared for the reasonable sacrifice in FS2004 (i'm not even sure that a word "sacrifice" is properly chosen). Honestly speaking, I'm pretty much happy with old C9 KLAX except for the lack of AES. Moreover, I'm still using C9 EHAM instead of crappy EHAM of other developer.

Bottom line: the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder

Yes and since we spend more time in the air and less time on the ground, we can go on with good compromise. Most importing thing is AES compatible!  Sorry guys, U can't recommend me BP  Grin
Logged

VA. Captain Frank Rose
"United we stand and divided we fall"
My PC spec: MS Win10 pro 64 bit - Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ OC to 5.0 GHz - 16GB Ram - Geforce 1080TI 11GBVRAM - P3Dv4.3
CngDelta757
Newbie
*
Posts: 11



« Reply #140 on: September 20, 2011, 05:28:01 PM »

I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

Beautiful!!! Yeah I succumbed to the FSX version and I am pleased with the FPS... great work and my apologies for my rage  Wink
Logged
keino333
Full Member
***
Posts: 166


« Reply #141 on: September 20, 2011, 08:13:11 PM »

I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

Great news..  Smiley We can live with it  Cheesy I'm sure it will look super... Just like DFW

Ditto....I happy and smiling...and and shall graciously wait..
Thanks for the News Umberto....
Logged
CngDelta757
Newbie
*
Posts: 11



« Reply #142 on: September 20, 2011, 11:00:32 PM »

I purchased O'hare for FS9 and got the FSX one too included... Will that be available for LAX if an FS9 version comes along?
Logged
Ray
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 74


« Reply #143 on: September 20, 2011, 11:01:23 PM »

Thank you very much Umberto for that update on a possible FS9 version. Keeping the fingers crossed it will work out! Again, thank you for your efforts!
Logged
newmanix
Beta tester
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 755



« Reply #144 on: September 21, 2011, 04:54:16 AM »

I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...

 Smiley Cheesy Grin Shocked Cool Kiss YAYYYYYY!!!!!!! Great news!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHOO HOO!!!!!!  Grin Grin

May I also ask how LSZH update is coming along too??
Logged
virtuali
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 37430



WWW
« Reply #145 on: September 21, 2011, 06:38:43 AM »

May I also ask how LSZH update is coming along too??

That one will come in time for the new Terminal B opening.
Logged

global express
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 79


« Reply #146 on: September 21, 2011, 11:37:35 AM »

Excellent!  Grin

May I ask, is Fabrizio still working on a Geneva update? I spoke with him in May and he said he would start as soon as the Hawaii airports were finished, but since then, he hasn't replied to any of my messages (I offered to help with pictures etc)...

Would be nice to hear how things are progressing, if possible.

Many thanks,
Alex
Logged
Fiedman
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


« Reply #147 on: September 23, 2011, 07:59:36 AM »

Will There be an FS9 version?
Logged
Lindbergh72
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 745



« Reply #148 on: September 23, 2011, 08:07:40 AM »

Will There be an FS9 version?

Maybe... he will be testing it I guess.
Logged

VA. Captain Frank Rose
"United we stand and divided we fall"
My PC spec: MS Win10 pro 64 bit - Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ OC to 5.0 GHz - 16GB Ram - Geforce 1080TI 11GBVRAM - P3Dv4.3
SirIsaac726
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 667


« Reply #149 on: September 23, 2011, 05:35:59 PM »

Will There be an FS9 version?

This question has been answered countless times.  Take a read through and you'll find that it is uncertain but Umberto did reveal optimism.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!