|
Dimon
|
 |
« Reply #135 on: September 20, 2011, 02:20:31 PM » |
|
So....what are the chances of FS2004 version as of today, September 20th, 2011?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
virtuali
|
|
« Reply #136 on: September 20, 2011, 02:50:21 PM » |
|
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lindbergh72
|
|
« Reply #137 on: September 20, 2011, 02:54:40 PM » |
|
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...
Great news..  We can live with it  I'm sure it will look super... Just like DFW |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dimon
|
|
« Reply #138 on: September 20, 2011, 02:57:53 PM » |
|
Thank you, folks.
Obviously, we do not expect all this fancy-shmancy stuff from FSX and we're well prepared for the reasonable sacrifice in FS2004 (i'm not even sure that a word "sacrifice" is properly chosen). Honestly speaking, I'm pretty much happy with old C9 KLAX except for the lack of AES. Moreover, I'm still using C9 EHAM instead of crappy EHAM of other developer.
Bottom line: the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lindbergh72
|
|
« Reply #139 on: September 20, 2011, 03:17:54 PM » |
|
Thank you, folks.
Obviously, we do not expect all this fancy-shmancy stuff from FSX and we're well prepared for the reasonable sacrifice in FS2004 (i'm not even sure that a word "sacrifice" is properly chosen). Honestly speaking, I'm pretty much happy with old C9 KLAX except for the lack of AES. Moreover, I'm still using C9 EHAM instead of crappy EHAM of other developer.
Bottom line: the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder
Yes and since we spend more time in the air and less time on the ground, we can go on with good compromise. Most importing thing is AES compatible! Sorry guys, U can't recommend me BP  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CngDelta757
Newbie
Posts: 12
|
|
« Reply #140 on: September 20, 2011, 04:28:01 PM » |
|
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...
Beautiful!!! Yeah I succumbed to the FSX version and I am pleased with the FPS... great work and my apologies for my rage  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
keino333
|
|
« Reply #141 on: September 20, 2011, 07:13:11 PM » |
|
I'd say fairly good...I made some tests with terminals, they looks different from FSX, but not totally crap...
Great news.. We can live with it I'm sure it will look super... Just like DFW Ditto....I happy and smiling...and and shall graciously wait.. Thanks for the News Umberto.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CngDelta757
Newbie
Posts: 12
|
|
« Reply #142 on: September 20, 2011, 10:00:32 PM » |
|
I purchased O'hare for FS9 and got the FSX one too included... Will that be available for LAX if an FS9 version comes along?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ray
Jr. Member
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #143 on: September 20, 2011, 10:01:23 PM » |
|
Thank you very much Umberto for that update on a possible FS9 version. Keeping the fingers crossed it will work out! Again, thank you for your efforts!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
newmanix
|
|
« Reply #144 on: September 21, 2011, 03:54:16 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pleased FSDT customer and FS9ner. BTW Happy belated birthday to FS9!! She is 8-years-old and going strong!!
|
|
|
|
virtuali
|
|
« Reply #145 on: September 21, 2011, 05:38:43 AM » |
|
May I also ask how LSZH update is coming along too?? That one will come in time for the new Terminal B opening. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
global express
Jr. Member
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #146 on: September 21, 2011, 10:37:35 AM » |
|
Excellent! May I ask, is Fabrizio still working on a Geneva update? I spoke with him in May and he said he would start as soon as the Hawaii airports were finished, but since then, he hasn't replied to any of my messages (I offered to help with pictures etc)... Would be nice to hear how things are progressing, if possible. Many thanks, Alex |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fiedman
Newbie
Posts: 2
|
|
« Reply #147 on: September 23, 2011, 06:59:36 AM » |
|
Will There be an FS9 version?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lindbergh72
|
|
« Reply #148 on: September 23, 2011, 07:07:40 AM » |
|
Will There be an FS9 version?
Maybe... he will be testing it I guess. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SirIsaac726
|
|
« Reply #149 on: September 23, 2011, 04:35:59 PM » |
|
Will There be an FS9 version?
This question has been answered countless times. Take a read through and you'll find that it is uncertain but Umberto did reveal optimism. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
