FSDreamTeam forum
September 19, 2014, 06:48:39 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: KIAH has been released!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Poll
Question: What scenery would you like to be developed by FSDT next ?  (Voting closed: September 09, 2010, 04:30:20 PM)
KSAN - San Diego Intl. - 91 (14.2%)
CYVR - Vancouver Intl. - 106 (16.5%)
KBWI - Baltimore Intl. - 62 (9.7%)
PANC - Anchorage Ted Stevens Intl. - 106 (16.5%)
LIRF - Rome Fiumicino - 131 (20.4%)
LIMC - Milan Malpensa - 29 (4.5%)
KEWR - Newark Liberty Intl. - 117 (18.2%)
Total Voters: 641

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 30
  Print  
Author Topic: POLL 2: Help us choose the next FSDT scenery! - Additional choices  (Read 64719 times)
aal763
Newbie
*
Posts: 38


« Reply #285 on: November 12, 2011, 06:26:07 AM »

How about Milwaukee or Cleveland?  Both are hub airports.  Milwaukee is a hub for both Frontier airlines and AirTran Airways(I guess Southwest now).  Cleveland was a hub for Continental but now is a United hub because of the merger.  Both Airports are well-sized airports with some interesting runway/taxiway/terminal configurations.  Both airports are also terribly unrealistic in the default FSX installation.
Logged
aal763
Newbie
*
Posts: 38


« Reply #286 on: November 12, 2011, 06:30:03 AM »

Or......
I forgot to mention this in my last post, but Minneapolis/St.Paul (KMSP) would be very nice.
Logged
wideloadwhitford
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 259



« Reply #287 on: November 15, 2011, 09:28:34 PM »

How about we all just shut up and wait.


Ahhh easy.
Logged

Windows XP 32
E7400 OC 3.2Ghz cooled w/Arctic 7 Pro
320 Seagate 250 SATA Backup
4G Gskill 800
EVGA 9800GTX+ 512 MB
Lindbergh72
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 753



« Reply #288 on: November 15, 2011, 10:25:01 PM »

Or......
I forgot to mention this in my last post, but Minneapolis/St.Paul (KMSP) would be very nice.

+1 :-)
Logged

VA. Captain Frank Rose (Denmark, EU)
http://www.flyingtigersgroup.org/FTGioc/sigcreate/signatures/user_227.png
"United we stand and divided we fall"
My PC spec: MS Win7 64 bit SP1 - Intel Core i7-3820 CPU OC to 4.60 GHz 16 GB ram - Geforce 670 GTX OC 2GB
I fly: FSX
PUP4ORD
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1039


UA777


« Reply #289 on: November 15, 2011, 11:33:47 PM »

Or......
I forgot to mention this in my last post, but Minneapolis/St.Paul (KMSP) would be very nice.
You not the only one who wants to see KMSP being done. If you had searched the forums you would have realized there's already a topic discussing about the above named airport. Smiley As for Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, BluePrint Simulations has a version while not the absolute best. I have it only for the simple reason that I live in Northeast Ohio and commercialy available. Undecided
Logged

KENNETH M."PUP"CRADDOCK II
Ladies and Gentlemen please fasten your seatbelts for a short ride......
http://pup4ordfsxmore.blogspot.com/

ALIENWARE AURORA R4 MSWIN7 64BIT  As for the rest of it......HuhHuhHuh
KK
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


« Reply #290 on: November 17, 2011, 08:53:26 PM »

I vote for KSAN - San Diego Intl
Ive seen this Airport when I took a trip down to San Diego

Logged
Bruce Hamilton
Beta tester
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1685



« Reply #291 on: November 18, 2011, 02:06:55 PM »

I vote for KSAN - San Diego Intl

You've already asked for free serials for LAS and LAX, so you wouldn't buy SAN if they made it.  Cool
Logged

Intel Core i7-4790 Haswell 4.0 GHz EVGA Z97 Classified EVGA Supernova 850 G2 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB GeForce GTX 780 Superclock
jillsky
Newbie
*
Posts: 4


« Reply #292 on: January 14, 2012, 07:50:26 PM »

Please please, after you do Vancouver and do the Update of JFK Cheesy please do KIAH, Houston Intercontinetal please
Thanks alot Lips sealed
Logged
juniormafia27
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 763


Better You Than Me


« Reply #293 on: January 15, 2012, 01:44:00 PM »

Please please, after you do Vancouver and do the Update of JFK Cheesy please do KIAH, Houston Intercontinetal please
Thanks alot Lips sealed

Yes KIAH Grin
Logged

ASUS Maximus Extreme-Z
 Windows 7 64Bit
 Intel Sandy Bridge 2600K 4.6Ghz
 16GB Corsiar 2000mhz DDR3 Dominator Ram
 Cosiar 750 Watt
 Corsair H100-Water Cooler
 EVGA 460 GTS
ASUS 27 inch LED Monitor

 FS9 & FSX
BORRONI
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


« Reply #294 on: January 26, 2012, 04:11:57 PM »

ROME please !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Wink
Logged
haztronic
Newbie
*
Posts: 14


« Reply #295 on: January 29, 2012, 10:18:51 PM »

Definately KSAN, FSX needs a KSAN, and we need an upgrade from ftampas. Such a great and challenging airport to fly into, with its short runway and legendary parking lot that stands right in front of the touch down zone. Personally for me it has to be San Diego, not Rome. Also Long Beach would be a good future port Smiley
Logged
m vd linden
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


« Reply #296 on: February 23, 2012, 12:52:04 PM »

 the airport of Kuala Lumpur WMKK   Smiley
Logged
738
Newbie
*
Posts: 38


« Reply #297 on: February 23, 2012, 07:18:58 PM »

I know im way late to vote, but i would have voted for LIMC and LIRF.
Logged

Chris Howard
Delta787
Newbie
*
Posts: 7


« Reply #298 on: February 23, 2012, 10:37:15 PM »

I know this airport is not on your poll, but what about Atlanta-Hartsfield Jackson International Airport. Even thought it was made by ImagineSim ( I used it in FS9), I feel if you guys did the world's busiest airport and home of Delta Air Lines, it would be magnificent. So please give this one a thought to be done. It would be excellent to see this airport done by FSDT and then combine it with GSX, it would be OUTSTANDING!!!!
Logged
Bob Savo
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


« Reply #299 on: February 28, 2012, 12:52:05 AM »

If you need KSAN so bad why dont you check out SimMarket sells the KSAN by DeVinci its not bad. I have a whole list of airports
 I would love the the time to make them is very long. I would love to Have Charlotte or Tucson or Salt Lake City. Thanks  Bob
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 30
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!