FSDreamTeam forum
June 19, 2013, 05:50:38 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: GSX Released!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Poll
Question: What scenery would you like to be developed by FSDT next ?  (Voting closed: September 09, 2010, 04:30:20 PM)
KSAN - San Diego Intl. - 91 (14.2%)
CYVR - Vancouver Intl. - 106 (16.5%)
KBWI - Baltimore Intl. - 62 (9.7%)
PANC - Anchorage Ted Stevens Intl. - 106 (16.5%)
LIRF - Rome Fiumicino - 131 (20.4%)
LIMC - Milan Malpensa - 29 (4.5%)
KEWR - Newark Liberty Intl. - 117 (18.2%)
Total Voters: 642

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 24
  Print  
Author Topic: POLL 2: Help us choose the next FSDT scenery! - Additional choices  (Read 40152 times)
pride545
Beta tester
Full Member
*****
Posts: 111



« Reply #240 on: September 24, 2011, 07:37:48 AM »

Huh  Is this me or nobody asked for Salt lake City ??

I mean, is there any problem there ? Bubonic plague ?

I really like to have opinions from americans. is there an amazing FS9/FSX scenery already ??

Thanks !

Dom


+2 for Salt Lake! It was started once, but the person got lost somewhere!!


« Last Edit: September 24, 2011, 07:43:12 AM by pride545 » Logged

Moe Works
pride545
Beta tester
Full Member
*****
Posts: 111



« Reply #241 on: September 24, 2011, 07:39:57 AM »

Im going to have to cast my vote again for Minneapolis/St Paul Intl (KMSP), Minnesota, but i also want to see if San Antonio Intl (KSAT), Texas can be done because the freeware scenery sucks.

How many times and how many threads are you going to post this in? I think FSDT has bigger fish to fry than KMSP at the moment, like finishing KLAX, finishing GSX, updating LSZH, and other airports they said they are going to bring to KLAX/KDFW standards. Although I wouldn't mind KMSP, I would rather have them do KMIA, KATL (replace the Imaginesim version), KIAH, or KDEN.

You're entitled to your opion. Just don't jump at someone else for theirs. He can post all he wants, just like you can!!
Logged

Moe Works
cmpbllsjc
Beta tester
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 906



« Reply #242 on: September 24, 2011, 10:39:42 PM »

You're entitled to your opion. Just don't jump at someone else for theirs. He can post all he wants, just like you can!!

Yes Sir Sgt  Tongue

Yet, you dont follow your own advice when responding to Bruce pointing out that an airport someone requested is already available by another developer, lol.

I think you are a pumper for Blue print......they really suck according to everyone else!!
Logged
DMac10121
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 70


Boeing + Bombardier


« Reply #243 on: October 01, 2011, 06:57:03 PM »

I vote for Vancouver!
Logged
hockey122332
Newbie
*
Posts: 22


« Reply #244 on: October 03, 2011, 08:35:11 PM »

Go San Diego!!!!!!!! Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Logged
Bruce Hamilton
Beta tester
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1544



« Reply #245 on: October 04, 2011, 01:01:43 PM »

With SFO, LAX, and SJC already done, do we really need SAN?   Wink
Logged

Intel Core i7-2600 Sandy Bridge 3.40GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB  GeForce 8800GTX
PUP4ORD
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 997


UA777


« Reply #246 on: October 04, 2011, 05:23:44 PM »

Well it would complete the major airports in California.....right!!! Grin
Logged

KENNETH M."PUP"CRADDOCK II
Ladies and Gentlemen please fasten your seatbelts for a short ride......
http://pup4ordfsxmore.blogspot.com/

ALIENWARE AURORA R4 MSWIN7 64BIT  As for the rest of it......HuhHuhHuh
cmpbllsjc
Beta tester
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 906



« Reply #247 on: October 04, 2011, 05:33:25 PM »

With SFO, LAX, and SJC already done, do we really need SAN?   Wink

I'd buy KSAN if FT re-did their version for FSX or if FSDT did a version. Hypothetically speaking of airports on the western side of the US, if KSEA, KSLT, KPDX, and KSAN all came out the same day. I would buy KSAN first, followed by KPDX, KSEA, and KSLT, in that order.
Logged
Johan
Full Member
***
Posts: 217


« Reply #248 on: October 04, 2011, 09:07:27 PM »

I think KSAN would be great. Since it is a relatively small airport, maybe a joint scenery with Coronado Naval Base nearby would bring even more appeal to the fighter pilots out there....just a thought.

Johan
Logged
KJFK
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


« Reply #249 on: October 05, 2011, 03:31:00 PM »

I really would be looking forward to a nice rendering of Newark Liberty International Airport. There is currently no FSX version available.

Great Job on LAX btw... keep it up  Wink

Logged
booforty
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 65



« Reply #250 on: October 12, 2011, 02:27:51 PM »

So Rome has won the most votes and this airport is long overdue.  Italy has often been overlooked and Rome is one of the biggest and busiest in Europe.

Looking forward to a quality version from FSDT  Wink
Logged
member111222
Newbie
*
Posts: 38


« Reply #251 on: October 12, 2011, 04:32:48 PM »

That's what I would like to see from FSDT. Grin

1.KSAN
2.Rome
3.KMIA
4.KEWR
Logged
wb2002
Beta tester
Full Member
*****
Posts: 106



« Reply #252 on: October 12, 2011, 11:06:52 PM »

I really wish that Fsdt would do KIAH and KMIA. Both are beautiful and International airports with lots of traffic - national and international flights.

Logged

wb2002

ASUS P6X58 Premium/Intel i7-930 OC TO 4.2
Mushkin Redline (3x2GB) 6-8-6-24/Win 7 Ultimate 64
2x150GB SATA WD Raptor-No Raid/2x1TB SATA WD ST31000524AS-No Raid
2x SATA DRW-24B1ST/EVGA GTX 580/Thermaltake W0106 700W PSU
3x SILENX 120X25MM FANS + 2x 10in XCLIO Wind Tunnel Case Fans
Robert_VAE [dsflyerds]
Beta tester
Jr. Member
*****
Posts: 61


WWW
« Reply #253 on: October 13, 2011, 02:10:01 AM »

Well it would complete the major airports in California.....right!!! Grin

No there would still need to be OAK, SAN, SNA SMF, BUR, ONT before all the major airports were done.
Logged

Robert Fitzgereld
VAE - MSD
www.virtual-aviation.org


cmpbllsjc
Beta tester
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 906



« Reply #254 on: October 13, 2011, 08:28:42 AM »

No there would still need to be OAK, SAN, SNA SMF, BUR, ONT before all the major airports were done.

A pretty good looking freeware SNA just released by MK Studios the other day for FSX and FS9. Of course not as nice as FSDT, but overall pretty well done judging by the screen shots and more cosmetically pleasing than BP's offerings.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 24
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!