|
Bruce Hamilton
|
 |
« Reply #255 on: October 13, 2011, 01:00:12 PM » |
|
...and more cosmetically pleasing than BP's offerings. I might agree with that if they had used landclass or mesh underneath instead of photoreal. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Intel Core i7-2600 Sandy Bridge 3.40GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB GeForce 8800GTX
|
|
|
|
cmpbllsjc
|
|
« Reply #256 on: October 13, 2011, 03:37:16 PM » |
|
...and more cosmetically pleasing than BP's offerings. I might agree with that if they had used landclass or mesh underneath instead of photoreal. Does the photoreal look bad? I downloaded it but still have yet to install it. There's probably a bgl you can remove/rename to go back to just regular ground textures and landclass. Speaking of which, I hate the photoreal squares that come with BP sceneries and usually remove them and go with the GEX textures for the area since the BP photoreal doesn't blend at all. I wish they would just use some streets around the airport as a border for the photoreal like FSDT does, rather than just a big square chunck of photoreal that is harder to blend. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pmb11
Newbie
Posts: 20
|
|
« Reply #257 on: October 14, 2011, 10:26:36 AM » |
|
Hi,
I'd go for Rome, too. I really don't understand why no one did Rome for FSX. It's a major European Airport (and City). Given there are now three versions of Zürich compared to none of Rome this should be commercially interesting, too.
I don't know if this is an option, but the Cloud 9 Rome scenery might need an overhaul, too (or, better, be redone). This would make a nice companion edition/addon.
Regards, Michael
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Hamilton
|
|
« Reply #258 on: October 14, 2011, 01:01:29 PM » |
|
Does the photoreal look bad? I downloaded it but still have yet to install it. There's probably a bgl you can remove/rename to go back to just regular ground textures and landclass. Thats what I would do, if I downloaded it. The photoreal I saw looked like your standard chunk from MSE with no blending in at all. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Intel Core i7-2600 Sandy Bridge 3.40GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB GeForce 8800GTX
|
|
|
sddjd
Newbie
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #259 on: October 20, 2011, 11:25:20 PM » |
|
My vote, still SAN though it's just become a much larger project for any potential developer:  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flyguy9876
Newbie
Posts: 2
|
|
« Reply #260 on: October 21, 2011, 01:41:51 AM » |
|
I know I'm probably way late on this subject (so sorry in advance). I was thinking thought that maybe FS Dreamteam could do Reagan National in DC. I have not seen anyone do that as a payware addon. Plus its a smaller airport so it could be done quicker then or in tandem with maybe a larger airport project. Lastly its got some unique approaches that are a bit trick, so it could be fun to see some decent scenery to shot these approaches into. Well thats my 2 cents. Either way, I will probably buy whatever it is they design next because I find FSDT's scenery to pretty much set the bar in the payware world.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PUP4ORD
|
|
« Reply #261 on: October 22, 2011, 12:47:46 AM » |
|
My vote, still SAN though it's just become a much larger project for any potential developer: Not bad of a design look..... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Hamilton
|
|
« Reply #262 on: October 22, 2011, 01:45:15 PM » |
|
I was thinking thought that maybe FS Dreamteam could do Reagan National in DC. I have not seen anyone do that as a payware addon. Plus its a smaller airport so it could be done quicker then or in tandem with maybe a larger airport project. It also shares the same problem as Chicago Midway, being almost right across the street from another major airport that has been covered. Best option would be to install the C9 version into FSX, if it would even be possible. Only Umberto can really answer that one. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Intel Core i7-2600 Sandy Bridge 3.40GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB GeForce 8800GTX
|
|
|
Flyguy9876
Newbie
Posts: 2
|
|
« Reply #263 on: October 23, 2011, 03:31:40 AM » |
|
..It also shares the same problem as Chicago Midway, being almost right across the street from another major airport that has been covered.
Could say that about KSAN, Newark, or a lot of others suggested airports in souther cali that folks are saying they would like to see done. If FSDT wants to avoid doing a scenery that neighbours another modelled scenery (even if by other developers), then I would say do CYVR or CYYZ. There isnt anything currently on the market for any major Canadian airports, for FSX at least.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
skypara
Newbie
Posts: 11
|
|
« Reply #264 on: October 23, 2011, 10:22:45 AM » |
|
Roma... Andiamo ragazzi... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Hamilton
|
|
« Reply #265 on: October 23, 2011, 01:28:28 PM » |
|
Could say that about KSAN, Newark, or a lot of others suggested airports... Not really, because Reagan and Midway are in the same cities as other major airports. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Intel Core i7-2600 Sandy Bridge 3.40GHz Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB GeForce 8800GTX
|
|
|
bmarcoux
Newbie
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #266 on: October 24, 2011, 10:13:15 PM » |
|
Would LOVE to see KPHX done. No one has done one for fs9. That would pretty much complete the southern west coast with KSAN,KLAS,KSFO and now KLAX being done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eabraham767
Jr. Member
Posts: 55
|
|
« Reply #267 on: October 25, 2011, 01:35:25 AM » |
|
Would LOVE to see KPHX done. No one has done one for fs9. That would pretty much complete the southern west coast with KSAN,KLAS,KSFO and now KLAX being done.
Flight Beam Studios is working on KPHX |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Avatar
Newbie
Posts: 13
|
|
« Reply #268 on: October 25, 2011, 01:24:50 PM » |
|
and the next after LIRF should be LIMC, LIRA, LIMF, LIEO, LIBK, LICC, LICJ, LIBP. The market is satured with american airports that we don't use to fly anyway. So please from now on more Italian and european airports. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
virtuali
|
|
« Reply #269 on: October 25, 2011, 02:02:09 PM » |
|
The market is satured with american airports that we don't use to fly anyway. "Saturated" ? Are you aware how many BIG airports are in the US ? And without counting those made with FS8-style graphic quality, the market is exactly the opposite as "saturated". And beside, who is the "we" that doesn't use or fly in the US airport ? Last time we made an Italian airport, it sold in 3 years less than KLAX in the first 3 HOURS... We are not having another poll. The poll was made and closed, we'll take it into account for the next scenery, which will not come soon. We have a couple of very likely candidates, and they all got good ratings in this poll. We'll announce what we decided very soon. It's not in Italy, and it's not KMIA. The only thing sure, it's in North America... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
