A new file is in the first post. I added some parking positions and changed others. JNT codes are now in the west side of the airport as well. Try this one and comment. Anyway the file from Mike is also a good one with a different "parking" approach in the west side of the airport. Anyway, I think that this question of parking positions depends from the traffic each one uses. I added a lot of stands, but I can not add more 100 or 200 stands, just because one user decides to use a lot of Ga traffic. I think that 110 parking positions which include the JNT ones, the cargo stands and a few military spots is more than enough to handle all Ga traffic.
One more note: since a lot of users have the problem of the default taxi widths, I changed all the necessary ones to 1 feet. I donīt have that problem but since there are a lot of users with it, I changed widths just fit all tastes and faced problems.
Harpsi you've done some outstanding work with the various FSDT sceneries and it's amazing you do this stuff for free. I say the same thing for Mike more so looking at his latest version of the KLAS afcad (which doesn't contain crossing runways) is so spot on it's hard to choose between the two. I've flown more that a few approaches with Mikes AFCAD and I'm finding I really like the file all around. Everything from the vectors into the airport to the GA parking and accurate airline gates it's hard to choose between the Harpsi file and his. Harpsi does your latest file have crossing runways included which I find more than not vector me to phantom runways (22R/L) that are no where near the actual airport? Also does an afcad affect the vectored approach pattern into an airport? The approach into KLAS seems modified compared to sceneries I've had of KLAS in the past. Mike's last file really hit the nail on the head and I hope whichever one FSDT decides to officially include in their product the other Afcad get's uploaded on sites like Flightsim.com and Avsim. Both of you guys need a paycheck for your efforts here...