Author Topic: AFCAD (Read 57538 times)

harpsi · « **Reply #30 on:** October 31, 2007, 01:55:42 pm »

Hi

About your problem, you know that runway 28 is much closer to the aprons than runway 16. That´s why airplanes will choose that runway for TO. I will make runway 28 shorter, something arround 6000 or 6500 feet maximum. With this lenght, landings and TOs on runway 28 will happen less times and light aircrafts will be the main clients on this runway.

Send me your parking codes to harpsinuno@hotmail.com. Tks.

harpsi

EDDT-Sebi · « **Reply #31 on:** October 31, 2007, 05:47:49 pm »

Well, try change by runways... to smale/short Runways 28/10!

Sebastian
Berlin, Germany

harpsi · « **Reply #32 on:** October 31, 2007, 07:04:53 pm »

Hi

Try this one.
I shortened runway 28. Now, it has 6500 feet. It is mainly used for CRJ, ERJ, Fokker, saab, dornier, ATR, Avros, B737 and general aviation. I think it is more than enough.

I will make a new topic after all these afcads, when I can finally find a very good one. We are almost near

harpsi

P.S.: after cimber´s good request

harpsi · « **Reply #33 on:** October 31, 2007, 10:54:44 pm »

Hi again

I tried now to avoid crossings in some nodes, to let traffic flow even more. Taxiway F is now for inbound and E for outbound for about 95 % of the traffic, since it didn´t happen so much in all previous afcads. Of course all other issues are solved. With this 3 or 4 places in which apron lines cross each other, it may happen that one or two times if you have a lot of traffic, there are colisions from the aircrafts coming from runway 16 after landing and the ones taxxing to the holding point of runway 16 via taxiway E. It happened two or three times to me in 2 or 3 hours of experience. Runway 28 has now 6400 feet. About landings on runway 28, you may expect all the aircraft types mentioned in the post before, plus A319 and maybe A320 or 321. I saw them landing as well.

I see that there are some downloads of the afcad files, but I don´t see any comments. I hope to see them, because otherwise is difficult to see if this work is having results. You may try this afcad. I removed the one before.

harpsi

[attachment deleted by admin]

harpsi · « **Reply #34 on:** November 01, 2007, 01:22:16 pm »

Here is the queue to runway 16

harpsi

[attachment deleted by admin]

D-AILI · « **Reply #35 on:** November 01, 2007, 06:13:17 pm »

Just tested harpsi's file: really great work!!

harpsi · « **Reply #36 on:** November 01, 2007, 06:19:02 pm »

Quote from: D-AILI on November 01, 2007, 06:13:17 pm

Just tested harpsi's file: really great work!!

Good that you like it

I am waiting for more comments. I would like to know if it is working more or less like in real life.

harpsi

heliosair · « **Reply #37 on:** November 01, 2007, 07:18:39 pm »

good work.. only one thing... its radio freq. Everybody is speaking in the freq 118.100 being on the ground or approach. Maybe we should change it around for example 121.900

harpsi · « **Reply #38 on:** November 01, 2007, 07:31:53 pm »

Hi

But this has nothing to do with the afcad or am I wrong? Are you talking about ATC?

harpsi

heliosair · « **Reply #39 on:** November 01, 2007, 07:44:43 pm »

yeah. i dont know much of this.. just though as it gives in the afcad program the freq and u can een change it. So i dont know...

harpsi · « **Reply #40 on:** November 01, 2007, 07:46:27 pm »

Hi

I don´t think that ground frequencies have anything to do with the afcad work. This is maybe something for an ATC forum. But somebody can correct me if I am wrong.

harpsi

Goecki · « **Reply #41 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:04:07 pm »

I thought, it can be changed by the frequencies list in AFCAD.

By the way, harpsi, I really appreciate your work. I wish I could deal with the crosswind method. Many thanks for your AFCAD!!!!

harpsi · « **Reply #42 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:34:54 pm »

Hi

Well, heliosair wrote about people talking, so maybe I thought he was talking about ATC or online flying (vatsim or ivao). Well, anyway I can change those frequencies as well.

harpsi

harpsi · « **Reply #43 on:** November 01, 2007, 11:10:37 pm »

Hi

Here it is. Frequencies and afcad.

harpsi

[attachment deleted by admin]

heliosair · « **Reply #44 on:** November 02, 2007, 05:16:55 am »

i mean does this affect FS ATC freq?

News: