FSDreamTeam forum

Developer's Backdoor => Chicago O'Hare V2 => Topic started by: Alessandro on April 16, 2018, 09:24:09 pm

Title: Preview2
Post by: Alessandro on April 16, 2018, 09:24:09 pm
.
Title: Re: Preview2
Post by: Hnla on April 16, 2018, 11:04:19 pm
Why is it in 2018 with P3D V4.2 with 64-bit technology that we still have barren tarmacs, with hardly any service vehicles. One would think this would be a scene of an abandoned airport.

KMEM was the only airport ever released that had a realistic number of tarmac vehicles, people, and the representation of a "crowded gate". However this was not present in any other airport. Why??

Title: Re: Preview2
Post by: F737NG on April 17, 2018, 03:41:24 am
Quote from: Hnla on April 16, 2018, 11:04:19 pm
Why is it in 2018 with P3D V4.2 with 64-bit technology that we still have barren tarmacs, with hardly any service vehicles. One would think this would be a scene of an abandoned airport.

KMEM was the only airport ever released that had a realistic number of tarmac vehicles, people, and the representation of a "crowded gate". However this was not present in any other airport. Why??

The reason for a lack of tarmac vehicles is given in the first sentence of this post.
http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,15673.msg112789.html#msg112789 (http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,15673.msg112789.html#msg112789)

I also think it is to avoid extra PC resource usage when approaching / at a large, detailed airport and with probably a lot of AI traffic also displayed.
Can you imagine the number of complaints from simmers suffering stutters when near a large, detailed airport which has "crowded gates"?
No developer needs that aggravation from customers.
Title: Re: Preview2
Post by: jbcallender on April 17, 2018, 05:44:03 am
Will it have the correct runways, currently numbered?

Jeff Callender
Title: Re: Preview2
Post by: Anders Bermann on April 17, 2018, 06:48:35 am
Quote from: jbcallender on April 17, 2018, 05:44:03 am
Will it have the correct runways, currently numbered?

Jeff Callender

Sorry for answering so blunt - but... what do you think? :)
Title: Re: Preview2
Post by: hjmx on April 17, 2018, 07:23:24 am
Quote
I also think it is to avoid extra PC resource usage when approaching / at a large, detailed airport and with probably a lot of AI traffic also displayed.
Can you imagine the number of complaints from simmers suffering stutters when near a large, detailed airport which has "crowded gates"?
No developer needs that aggravation from customers.

But then, it should be optional for those with a beefy system.
Title: Re: Preview2
Post by: Ifikratis on April 17, 2018, 11:50:48 am
Excellent! Looks amazing! Thank you FSDT. Hope its not too long the wait :)