FSDreamTeam forum
Cloud9 Support => Bergen scenery => Topic started by: AaronMyers on August 20, 2017, 07:01:54 pm
-
Just curious if this older scenery is supported in P3Dv4. Thanks in advance.
-
The installer hasn't been updated to install straight into P3DV4 but, if you install it in FSX or P3D and then run the Stand-Alone Addon Manager, it should migrate it into P3D V4 and should work.
-
The installer hasn't been updated to install straight into P3DV4 but, if you install it in FSX or P3D and then run the Stand-Alone Addon Manager, it should migrate it into P3D V4 and should work.
Hmm, someone must have covertly updated the installer because I did indeed have a P3dv4 option when installing, and it works a treat. Thanks!
http://i.imgur.com/aICG6fU.jpg (http://i.imgur.com/aICG6fU.jpg)
http://i.imgur.com/bVTUSwf.jpg (http://i.imgur.com/bVTUSwf.jpg)
-
Hmm, someone must have covertly updated the installer because I did indeed have a P3dv4 option when installing, and it works a treat. Thanks!
Yes, you are right, ENBR has been updated, it was Cloud9 KMCO that hasn't.
-
Yes, you are right, ENBR has been updated, it was Cloud9 KMCO that hasn't.
Hello - any chance to update the KMCO installer as well? Thanks!
-
I am having problems with Bergen in P3Dv4. The approach lighting system is sitting along the displaced threshold of the runway. I used the latest installer which identified P3Dv4 only, since that is the only simulator I have. I used this scenery in FSX and P3Dv3.4 and do not remember this issue.
I have created a P3D default scenery.cfg file to test this, and the only add-on sceneries are several FSDT airports and this Cloud9 Bergen.
I have removed the default Bergen file:
(LockheedMartin/scenery/601/APX49100),
so my photos show the Cloud9 Bergen scenery sitting on P3Dv4 default less the P3Dv4 Bergen airport.
Any one have any suggestions how I rectify this situation? I am presuming the approach lighting should not be sitting on the threshold.
Nigel
Vancouver
-
Any one have any suggestions how I rectify this situation? I am presuming the approach lighting should not be sitting on the threshold.
Always check real world first, before assuming a scenery is wrong...
https://www.google.it/maps/@60.2812345,5.2222415,91m/data=!3m1!1e3 (https://www.google.it/maps/@60.2812345,5.2222415,91m/data=!3m1!1e3)
As you can see, approach lights are right on top of the displaced threshold.
-
You're right, this scenery is OOLLLLLDDDDDD
-
Hi Umberto
Thx for your reply. In fact, I had checked on GoogleEarth before, and I figured the lights I saw were at surface level of the displaced threshold.
However, it is not making $$sense to me to pave a displaced threshold then put vertical structures on it – why expend money on paving, if the paving cannot be used to land on in a fall-short landing.
Don’t waste time answering this, you have more important issues for others to answer! I can now continue flying knowing that Bergen is okay.
Regards and thx
Nigel