FSDreamTeam forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: FsxPro500 on March 02, 2014, 02:59:03 am

Title: Next Scenery
Post by: FsxPro500 on March 02, 2014, 02:59:03 am
I know you are remaking KLAS and making Houston, but what are you going to make after them? O'Hare V3 might be good. Then again, a new airport would be good. The only payware airports developers left out were EWR and ATL (yes I know someone made that but it is average). I think the best option would be Seattle-Tacoma. It was never made by any developer for FSX and many airlines fly there. Could this be the next airport?
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: Hnla on March 02, 2014, 06:34:07 am
I am seriously starting to think that all you do in your life is plot different ways to get Umberto to update KORD for you.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: FsxPro500 on March 02, 2014, 03:53:44 pm
Not exactly, but ATL and EWR do sound very good after IAH. And no, that is not my main goal in life. I understand that no one wants to make an afcad for ORD. I'll just change some airline's parking codes.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: bradl on March 03, 2014, 07:29:23 pm

I still say that FSDT should make CYLW.  :P

BL.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: FsxPro500 on March 04, 2014, 02:38:07 pm
EDDF wouldn't be that bad.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: Hnla on March 04, 2014, 05:10:57 pm
The market is in US airports, not European airports.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: jay907uk on March 04, 2014, 05:47:40 pm
Not exactly, but ATL and EWR do sound very good after IAH. And no, that is not my main goal in life. I understand that no one wants to make an afcad for ORD. I'll just change some airline's parking codes.

Hi,

There is a good version of ATL made by Imaginesim in 2012 so what's the point in asking for this again!

I have no idea why they have are making KIAH when Flightbeam has produced this.

What they should have done is made an airport which hasn't been modelled good (ie KSDF , KMEM) These two have been made but not to a good quality.

Why people have to ask for scenery which has already been made to a good standard does puzzle me indeed.

If FSDream Team made a new airport I'd deffo make a purchase but I won't be buying KIAH as I've got this already sorry FSdreamteam.

Rgds

Jason
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: virtuali on March 04, 2014, 06:12:06 pm
Quote
I have no idea why they have are making KIAH when Flightbeam has produced this.

??? Fligthbeam made KIAD ( Washington Dulles ), not KIAH!

Quote
I won't be buying KIAH as I've got this already sorry FSdreamteam.

You mean the Blueprint version ? They also have KJFK, KLAX and KDFW...
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: theshack440 on March 04, 2014, 06:22:45 pm
I think you must be confused... Flightbeam has currently developed only KSFO, KPHX and KIAD and are currently making KDEN and an unannounced airport (that I doubt is KIAH because they and FSDT are more of a team than competitors I believe). So FSDT are the only ones working on Houston's "megaport."

After Houston, I'd like to see (besides the expected updates of KLAS and perhaps KORD) KSEA or a smaller time airport like KCLE or maybe even KATL (even though imaginesim updated theirs), and I know Umberto said they were thinking about KATL as well. I'd love to see KEWR but I think the NYC area is already so fps heavy and with KJFK, etc it might not be the most practical. Plus Drzewiecki is still working on their NYC airport project.

It would also be really cool if they considered doing a big non us airport like VHHH or RJAA. Still, I bet whatever they do they will do one hell of a job with it as they always do.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: Bruce Hamilton on March 04, 2014, 06:30:51 pm
Why people have to ask for scenery which has already been made to a good standard does puzzle me indeed.

Depends on your idea of "good standard".  I started with the Blueprint version of KIAD in Washington DC.  When Imaginesim bettered the standard, I bought it a second time.  When Flightbeam bettered the standard yet again, I bought it yet again.  I don't see anyone raising the bar on Flightbeam, but if it happens...

Anyone can purchase what they need to produce scenery, but very few raise the bar higher on every piece they do.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: jay907uk on March 04, 2014, 06:42:39 pm
Hi,

oopps lol yes I think I got very confused there what a prat I am  :D :D.

My apologies on that one :)

I shall be purchasing IAH once it's released then. I dunno why I thought Flightbeam made it thanks guys for correcting me on that one.

Regards

Jason

Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: Captain Kevin on March 05, 2014, 02:42:13 am
Hi,

oopps lol yes I think I got very confused there what a prat I am  :D :D.

My apologies on that one :)

I shall be purchasing IAH once it's released then. I dunno why I thought Flightbeam made it thanks guys for correcting me on that one.

Regards

Jason
Probably because three out of four letters are exactly the same and in the exact same order in the ICAO codes of KIAD and KIAH.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: Frank Lindberg on March 05, 2014, 06:54:08 pm
EDDF wouldn't be that bad.

Oh yes, we do need a quality version of EDDF. Aerosoft's version is very old.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: FsxPro500 on March 06, 2014, 03:05:55 pm
 I think we need a good cargo airport like KSDF or KMEM.  KOAK isn't too bad.  PANC would probably be the best choice.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: cmpbllsjc on March 06, 2014, 10:49:30 pm
I think we need a good cargo airport like KSDF or KMEM.  KOAK isn't too bad.  PANC would probably be the best choice.

Aerosoft sells the Simwings PANC that is pretty good. Doubt FSDT will do a remake.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: Bruce Hamilton on March 06, 2014, 10:54:16 pm
Problem is everybody is spoiled.  If it isn't Dreamteam or Flightbeam, it isn't good enough.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: FsxPro500 on March 06, 2014, 11:52:51 pm
Or FlyTampa...
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: PUP4ORD on March 12, 2014, 06:51:21 am
What's wrong with being spoiled? With each airport being done we've waited patiently of between 6-9 months before its release. Id say there's nothing wrong with being spoiled. :)
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: aal763 on March 18, 2014, 06:06:20 pm
If any airports need to be done, they are KMKE and KCLE.  These airports have never gotten any love in FSX.  They are really fun airports as well.
Title: Re: Next Scenery
Post by: PUP4ORD on March 19, 2014, 08:59:02 am
If any airports need to be done, they are KMKE and KCLE.  These airports have never gotten any love in FSX.  They are really fun airports as well.
I had/have Blueprint Simulations version of Cleveland Hopkins International Airport since it is the only commercial one available for FSX. However I would like to see a high quality CLE done. :)