FSDreamTeam forum
Products Support => GSX Support FSX/P3D => Topic started by: afropop on January 27, 2013, 03:24:17 am
-
Hello everybody
I wonder if you can help me with the following error to the GSX, and with any aircraft in any scenario.
http://i1058.photobucket.com/albums/t413/afropopbrasileiro/gsxerror_zps5dab229e.jpg
-
That message says to check the Couatl.err log file, have you done that ?
-
shows this message.
couatl v2.0 (build 2337)
panic log started on Sat Jan 26 23:02:40 2013
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "couatl\common\fsm.py", line 67, in executeDoFuncToCompletion
File "couatl\GSX\assistanceServices\baseAssistanceVehicle.py", line 205, in do
File "couatl\common\simObjectMoverIK.py", line 286, in run
RuntimeError: cruise speed must be positive
couatl v2.0 (build 2337)
panic log started on Sat Jan 26 23:10:47 2013
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "couatl\common\fsm.py", line 67, in executeDoFuncToCompletion
File "couatl\GSX\assistanceServices\baseAssistanceVehicle.py", line 205, in do
File "couatl\common\simObjectMoverIK.py", line 286, in run
RuntimeError: cruise speed must be positive
couatl v2.0 (build 2337)
panic log started on Sat Jan 26 23:17:09 2013
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "couatl\common\fsm.py", line 67, in executeDoFuncToCompletion
File "couatl\GSX\assistanceServices\baseAssistanceVehicle.py", line 205, in do
File "couatl\common\simObjectMoverIK.py", line 286, in run
RuntimeError: cruise speed must be positive
tested at other airports so happens does not happen with just one. Airport Imperatriz SBIZ
Already edited the AFCAD more not get a good result.
I await contact.
-
Already edited the AFCAD more not get a good result.
I await contact.
That's surely an AFCAD error, I'll check it later the one you posted.
-
ok I'm waiting so thanks.
-
Already edited the AFCAD more not get a good result.
I await contact.
That's surely an AFCAD error, I'll check it later the one you posted.
Hello ja have any response on the AFCAD?
-
Hello ja have any response on the AFCAD ?
Will report as soon as I've have a reply, wouldn't make any sense reporting it *before*, wouldn't it ? Without mentioning that checking 3rd party AFCAD for their mistakes, it's not something that we are supposed to do as part of the normal product support, I was only interested having a look at it, if only to add additional code (there's a lot already inside) to GSX to defends itself against such errors.
-
Hello everybody
Excuse the inconvenience, already gave the file to see the scenario that I asked?