General Category > General Discussion
Hi everyone
JBU:
I could definetly see profit from this airport. I mean I was looking at the FT forum yesterday and customers asked a question and the response from fly tampa was just an a$$hole response. Unlike here at FSDT you have people who care to hear what you say. Not a company who claims there making some airport then doesnt follow through with it for another 2 years. And I would actually consider FLL a major airport. We both know its no JFK but it gets its diverse traffic and alot of i too.
thepilot:
--- Quote from: JBU on April 08, 2008, 09:24:11 pm --- I could definetly see profit from this airport. I mean I was looking at the FT forum yesterday and customers asked a question and the response from fly tampa was just an a$$hole response. Unlike here at FSDT you have people who care to hear what you say. Not a company who claims there making some airport then doesnt follow through with it for another 2 years. And I would actually consider FLL a major airport. We both know its no JFK but it gets its diverse traffic and alot of i too.
--- End quote ---
No, it was a very cool one imo ;D
better than just a simple 'no'...
CX 747-400:
--- Quote from: FLL_Spotter on April 08, 2008, 07:09:37 pm ---
--- Quote from: CX 747-400 on April 08, 2008, 05:52:23 am ---As someone that lives in Florida, I would like to see FLL done as well. However I can think of several others that deserve to made or remade before FLL.
--- End quote ---
But them again it seems that the big payware companies allways seem to do Big airports. If this FLL scenery is made then the people on VATSIM would fly into there benifitting Miami ARTCC. Now Flight Zone is making overlooked airport such as Portland and Providence and will soon be making KJAX but it seems itr has been in production for a while. You can guarantee a profit from this airport
--- End quote ---
I am not trying to be rude with what I am about to say, but I can not think of another way to say it.
Regarding Flight Zone (better known as Flight Scenery).....ARE YOU NEW?????? They stopped making scenery to go make Airliner XP, which is dead also; or at least has the look of being dead.
Sorry if it comes across rude!!!!! :) The did make 2 great sceneries, but they have even stopped responding to support requests, and to there forum. Cloud 9 was never as bad as Flight Scenery. :o
CX 747-400:
--- Quote from: thepilot on April 08, 2008, 10:19:50 pm ---
--- Quote from: JBU on April 08, 2008, 09:24:11 pm --- I could definetly see profit from this airport. I mean I was looking at the FT forum yesterday and customers asked a question and the response from fly tampa was just an a$$hole response. Unlike here at FSDT you have people who care to hear what you say. Not a company who claims there making some airport then doesnt follow through with it for another 2 years. And I would actually consider FLL a major airport. We both know its no JFK but it gets its diverse traffic and alot of i too.
--- End quote ---
No, it was a very cool one imo ;D
better than just a simple 'no'...
--- End quote ---
I am the one that asked the question that you claim got an a$$hole response. I have no issues with there response. If you ever have any issues with any of there products, they are right there to help you. You might get a few sarcastic responses, but there stand behind there products better than anyone out there today. ;D
FLL_Spotter:
Well it looks like we have another scenery maker besides Flight Scenery then so my vote is for KFLL; Ft Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version