General Category > General Discussion
blueprintsimulations with JFK news
windshear:
Hey Windshear, Check out DreamScenery's IND if you're interested in that version.
[/quote]
Thanks, but although they have taxi way line grass, they have almost no detail on their buildings and more importantly the gate area(where you will be closest to the building).
In hope how ever they will gradually get better and better!
Look at imaginesim, their airports are not up to par either, but their SIN and HKG were a step up, they made Asian airport bearable to fly to, I still hope people with talent will finally go Asian! There are many simmers in China, Japan and South Korea, combined with the many non Asians who would like to fly to say Tokyo Narita or Shanghai...
B777ER:
Tokyo Narita... Simply amazed nobody has done this for FSX.
SirIsaac726:
I'm amazed at how angry people get at BluePrint. :D Some of the reactions give me a good laugh, so thanks.
--- Quote from: theshack440 on January 15, 2012, 06:20:39 pm ---This business with JFK is somewhat silly for them because why should they compete with a much better product... but in other cases, like MCO, DTW, MSP, etc., it is good to have the option for payware if freeware is not available.
--- End quote ---
It certainly isn't silly. They've been doing this for a while now. They are in this as a business and a business wants to make money. They wouldn't be making these products if they weren't making money.
With DFW and JFK, I am a little baffled because they are charging 25 USD which, at that point, I would envision most customers just opting to spend a bit more for the more detailed version (FSDT). But I've only been in this market on the consumer side so who am I to question them. The one thing I know is they wouldn't be in the business for this long if they were losing money so they must at least be breaking even (but the more likely scenario is they are actually making a profit).
theshack440:
--- Quote from: SirIsaac726 on January 20, 2012, 06:44:36 am ---
--- Quote from: theshack440 on January 15, 2012, 06:20:39 pm ---This business with JFK is somewhat silly for them because why should they compete with a much better product... but in other cases, like MCO, DTW, MSP, etc., it is good to have the option for payware if freeware is not available.
--- End quote ---
It certainly isn't silly. They've been doing this for a while now. They are in this as a business and a business wants to make money. They wouldn't be making these products if they weren't making money.
With DFW and JFK, I am a little baffled because they are charging 25 USD which, at that point, I would envision most customers just opting to spend a bit more for the more detailed version (FSDT). But I've only been in this market on the consumer side so who am I to question them. The one thing I know is they wouldn't be in the business for this long if they were losing money so they must at least be breaking even (but the more likely scenario is they are actually making a profit).
--- End quote ---
That's what I'm saying (regarding JFK and DFW, etc.).
Of course it's not silly, it is a business and they are obviously making money. I was saying that for airports that have not been done for FSX yet, they are a good place to buy from. It also kind of bothers me how angry people seem to be at Blueprint; if it is so bad, then just don't buy it...
Didier Chabanne:
To compete and fsdreamteam flytampa and even sim-wings may have to Blueprint
change the way they do. To me the scenery's good but the colors have to change
gray and black and white to another color.
thank you
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version