General Category > General Discussion
blueprintsimulations with JFK news
newmanix:
and, and, just hang on a minute here. and while I am on this little rant of mine, anyone who posts Blueprint cardboard cut out Tonka toy developments in this forum is honestly just spitting right in Umberto's face and the entire FSDT team for that matter. Don't do that. That's just mean. Honestly. Just mean. >:(
It takes months for FSDT to put detail in their work while it takes merely seconds for Blueprint to release their form of (quality) hence their "quantity". Notifications of their lack of work just don't belong in a forum of HIGH QUALITY scenery developers.
Hey, anyone see that FREEWARE CYVR? I friggin love it man. It's only about 1,000,000 times better that Bluepirnt.
theshack440:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on January 15, 2012, 06:35:19 pm ---
--- Quote from: theshack440 on January 15, 2012, 06:20:39 pm ---...why should they compete with a much better product...
--- End quote ---
$ame rea$on they did LAX, DFW, and BO$. And the Cloud9 version of MCO is much better, IMO.
--- End quote ---
Well yes, obviously money is the reason for competing with better products. But what I mean is that they shouldn't be bothering with the already made better products, like LAX, JFK, BOS, etc. but for something like MCO where it is only available in FS9, why not have it...
PUP4ORD:
Hold on a minute.........I can't believe they are still going to touch another airport for release........My favorite one O'Hare International Airport. Aghhhhh..........
Blueprint would actually make me very angry if they release their version of ORD sometime this year >:(
Bruce Hamilton:
--- Quote from: PUP4ORD on January 15, 2012, 11:21:03 pm ---Blueprint would actually make me very angry if they release their version of ORD sometime this year
--- End quote ---
Why, you think it'll be better than what FSDT has done?
phenocom:
--- Quote from: theshack440 on January 15, 2012, 09:42:05 pm ---
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on January 15, 2012, 06:35:19 pm ---
--- Quote from: theshack440 on January 15, 2012, 06:20:39 pm ---...why should they compete with a much better product...
--- End quote ---
$ame rea$on they did LAX, DFW, and BO$. And the Cloud9 version of MCO is much better, IMO.
--- End quote ---
Well yes, obviously money is the reason for competing with better products. But what I mean is that they shouldn't be bothering with the already made better products, like LAX, JFK, BOS, etc. but for something like MCO where it is only available in FS9, why not have it...
--- End quote ---
Cloud 9 made Orlando for FSX not FS9
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version