General Category > General Discussion
Nice place we have here...
duckbilled:
--- Quote from: virtuali on October 26, 2011, 02:15:08 pm ---
--- Quote from: fwerff on October 26, 2011, 02:03:00 pm ---If you make it, can you please ensure compatibility with the OrbX Pacific Northwest and Pacific Fjords products?
--- End quote ---
Absolutely. In fact, the availability of such products is what has made us decide on Vancouver, hopefully the combination of a good scenery with a good airport will lead more users to fly there, even if they might not consider that area otherwise.
It would also make it for a nice west coast line: FSDT KLAX-> Flightbeam KSFO->FSDT CYVR->Aerosoft PANC
Main reason we decided against KMIA in the end, was its too close proximity with KFLL. And Vancouver is WAY better, from a scenic point of view.
--- End quote ---
All solid reasons - I like how you are thinking in terms of connectivity to products from other developers. You are not letting others dictate your actions but you are recognizing when other developers create opportunities. CYVR really opens up the US from the north without having to deal with the performance issues in Seattle. I bet it will sell well. I bet a lot of Canadians will jump on it due to the fact that Canadian airports have been largely ignored until recently.
I also have PNW but have avoided purchasing other ORBX regions due to the lack of large airports. I am sure I am not alone. Hopefully we will see more airports in the ORBX regions - they have created an opportunity for many smaller developers that has not caught on for some reason. Out of curiosity, does the existence of ORBX scenery make it more difficult or less difficult to develop an airport? I would think less difficult because you would only have to focus on the airport and not the surrounding area. Of course, I am not a developer so I could be way off here and there is always the need to accomodate those that don't have ORBX products.
Tino:
--- Quote from: virtuali on October 26, 2011, 02:15:08 pm ---
--- Quote from: fwerff on October 26, 2011, 02:03:00 pm ---If you make it, can you please ensure compatibility with the OrbX Pacific Northwest and Pacific Fjords products?
--- End quote ---
Absolutely. In fact, the availability of such products is what has made us decide on Vancouver, hopefully the combination of a good scenery with a good airport will lead more users to fly there, even if they might not consider that area otherwise.
It would also make it for a nice west coast line: FSDT KLAX-> Flightbeam KSFO->FSDT CYVR->Aerosoft PANC
Main reason we decided against KMIA in the end, was its too close proximity with KFLL. And Vancouver is WAY better, from a scenic point of view.
--- End quote ---
Virtuali,
I wanted to express my thank you for considering a Canadian airport! Thank you so much.
This airport would fit in perfectly with PNW and other addon’s such as Vancouver+ Scenery. I really look forward to seeing the screen shots! I fly into CYVR every 2 weeks. It's a fantastic airport!
Thanks again for everything you do.
Cheers,
Tino
CYYC
sundance70:
Thank you FSDT!!
Mr. Schutte:
Great news, Canada is in desperate need of sceneries for the FS world, finally they are getting the attention they deserve. This will be a great scenery, can't wait to see the previews.
tod:
YES YES TO FSX/FS9 CYVR. I usually read posts rather than write but I won't pass up on this one. Being from Vancouver and living abroad for the past few years, this is incredible news (yes I miss home but you're already making it better). Plus we don't get too many top-rated scenery developers venturing into the North so this is huge. First FT announced Montreal, now this. Luvin it!! Oh I can't wait to virtually fly home. FSDT you rock. Can't thank you enough. Cheers from HK. ;D ;D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version