General Category > General Discussion
KMIA in sight?
cmpbllsjc:
--- Quote from: Daniel Santoro on October 17, 2011, 09:04:07 pm ---You can see some previews here: http://www.flycay.com/forums/showthread.php?4138-LatinVFR-presents...-its-next-scenery!-(video)
--- End quote ---
The previews look pretty good.
I wonder how long they have been working on KMIA? I wouldn't think it would be that long, maybe a few months since it was always a project that FSDT considered and Intersim showed previews of. Even if they have been working on it for 6 months, it amazes me that they are able to complete it so quickly and Intersim had been supposedly working on it for around 2 years and still couldn't complete it.
I am interested to read some feedback from people who buy it, namely about how well it performs. I am also interested to see how the photoreal backdrop looks, how far it covers around the perimeter of the airport, how well it blends with GEX or stock textures in the area color wise, and how the night textures look. I would prefer the photoreal ground to be defined by using the main roads that border KMIA, rather than just a big chunck of photoreal slapped down over the top like Blue Print does. Those type of photoreal backdrops never look good in my opinion since they dont blend well with the surrounding area at all if you are using anything other than photoreal textures in the area. I suppose that I could always just remove the photo bgl if I dont like it and use my own photoreal backdrop for KMIA that I made last year to use with the default airport.
Bruce Hamilton:
I'd rather see either FlyTampa do "Miami Rebooted", like they did with Tampa, or an FSDT version. Those previews look no better than Blueprint to me.
Mr. Schutte:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on October 18, 2011, 02:06:26 pm ---Those previews look no better than Blueprint to me.
--- End quote ---
Come on Bruce, I am sure that even you could admit that there is no comparison between BluePrint and LatinVFR. Study this;
If the differences between these two sceneries is not noticeable to you, nobody is forcing you too buy it. ;)
777captain:
--- Quote from: Mr. Schutte on October 18, 2011, 04:37:08 pm ---
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on October 18, 2011, 02:06:26 pm ---Those previews look no better than Blueprint to me.
--- End quote ---
Come on Bruce, I am sure that even you could admit that there is no comparison between BluePrint and LatinVFR. Study this;
If the differences between these two sceneries is not noticeable to you, nobody is forcing you too buy it. ;)
--- End quote ---
I agree with you there, it is WAAY better than BP, but the LatinVFR jetbridges look a bit wonky to me :-\
geoffbecks:
--- Quote from: Mr. Schutte on October 18, 2011, 04:37:08 pm ---
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on October 18, 2011, 02:06:26 pm ---Those previews look no better than Blueprint to me.
--- End quote ---
Come on Bruce, I am sure that even you could admit that there is no comparison between BluePrint and LatinVFR. Study this;
If the differences between these two sceneries is not noticeable to you, nobody is forcing you too buy it. ;)
--- End quote ---
I am afraid I have to agree with Bruce in this one.....I will stick with the old flytampa sorry Latin VFR but it looks a bit too bland
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version