General Category > Unofficial F/A-18 Acceleration Pack board
vLSO Alpha Release
micro:
Serge, Sludge just explained to me what your getting at. Disregard my posts. Sorry bud.
Paddles:
Micro,
no problem! :)
Ok, here's another picture showing my current ranges layout.
Sludge:
Serge...
OK, that makes complete sense. Just wanted find out what you were thinking.
And now I'm looking forward to what Javier says, as to why (his) carrier is different from the Accel carrier.
Later
Sludge
Paddles:
Guys,
I've hastened to declare the Acceleration carrier free of ILS/FLOLS inconsistencies. When making comparisons I left NAV1 radio tuned to 112.0 (Javier's ILS) instead of tuning it to 111.0 (the Acceleration's ILS). As I said it before, the IFLOLS xml gauge uses ILS data, otherwise it shows rock steady ball. My apologies...
Here's another comparison picture so you can see that both carriers have almost the same ILS positions. Maybe this is the case in real life, I don't know...
Anyway, I still would like to know the exact position of the FLOLS focus. Until that I'll keep using trial-and-error method ;)
GOONIE:
Thanks Serge. I really like the profile shots of the carrier in your post from Heffley's doc (side and top views), could be nice additions to the vLSO debrief window. ;)
Also in your FSX pictures of Javier's carrier, it looks like there is only two wires across the deck (also thicker). Is this an artifact of taken the picture in OPT? Or do you have a Top Secret version of Javier's carrier with working arrestment wires? :o
-Capt
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version