General Category > Unofficial F/A-18 Acceleration Pack board

New DINO-T45C

<< < (7/8) > >>

DigitAL:
Neutrino here is a screenshot.  The fonts look different.  

neutrino:
The symbology on the screenshot looks OK to me. Your screenshot is 1280x720, I suppose you resized a 1920x1080 screenshot, where it should look even better. Keep in mind that the HUD is projected differently on the Hornet and the T-45C, the HUD on the T-45C is collimated (stays fixed relative to the outside world as you move your head around), so this may account for the difference you see.

I've attached a crop from a 1680x1050 screenshot to compare how it looks on my monitor. And also a resized 1920x1080 from a video with the previous T-45C v200. I think the only differences are due to zoom factor, resizing and compression.

Tregarth:
This is a follow on to one of my earlier posts in this topic.

Is there anyway to make the HUD symbols more intense i.e. darker and or brighter so they are more conspicuious?

Thank you,

Tregarth

neutrino:
Tregarth, unfortunately with xml based HUDs, there is no way to make them look any more clear or stand out better against the background. And there is no way to make them brighter or increase the contrast - you can just decrease brightness down from 100%. So there are only ways to make the symbology look worse. I have so far worked on HUDs for five different aircraft, and I have pestered the designers relentlessly until I was happy with the way the symbols look. However beyond a certain point, there is so much that can be improved. There are other technologies to implements the HUD other than xml graphics, but I have no experience with them.

Tregarth:
Dear Neutrino,

Thanks for the reply, you know about these things, I don't so you are right.

I am grateful to Dino and yourself for a wonderful which is a joy to fly.

Good work and Thank you.

Tregarth.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page