Developer's Backdoor > GSX Backdoor
GSX - A new product from FSDT - Ground Services X
welchb21:
boy i am soooooooo excited for this product to come out you have no idea. i have been looking for a product like this one for years and never had ne luck, i just wish i would have found out about this before i spent so much on AES, dont get me wrong i think AES is awesome, i just think that would be a much better product if they had all the airports like GSX is going to. All i know is that this product cant come out fast enough. Hope its all going well and you can definately count on me being one of the first to buy this addon. Thanks alot guys soooo happy someone finally developed this. :)
aircanadajet:
I have three new airports with NO ground services... KLAX, Vienna, and Chicago... I do not want to buy another $20 token worth of AES services! But how long until the release of this magnificent product?
virtuali:
--- Quote from: aircanadajet on November 30, 2011, 03:05:33 am ---I have three new airports with NO ground services... KLAX, Vienna, and Chicago... I do not want to buy another $20 token worth of AES services! But how long until the release of this magnificent product?
--- End quote ---
Patience, it won't be very long, we are full steam finishing it.
aircanadajet:
Thanks Umberto. I asked the people over at t***a about connecting jetways and how can you control them with crtl+shift+J, etc... and they told me I need AES for moving jetways! because their native airports' jetways don't move! So, what does that mean in regards to GSX?? Would you guys take care of moving jetways for every airport? and I am sure someone probably has already pointed this out...
virtuali:
--- Quote from: aircanadajet on November 30, 2011, 12:58:23 pm --- they told me I need AES for moving jetways! because their native airports' jetways don't move! So, what does that mean in regards to GSX?? Would you guys take care of moving jetways for every airport?
--- End quote ---
This was explained and discussed a long time ago and, right from the start we always said GSX wouldn't replace what scenery developers should do in the first place, at least if they claim a scenery being "FSX native", since moving jetways are a default FSX feature.
Asking to use AES had some sense under FS9, since it wasn't something that FS9 did very well (although we *did* some FS9 sceneries with moving jetways without requiring AES...), but there are no excuse in FSX not to do it.
If we had to create moving jetways for every 3rd party airport, we should interact with developers, which is a burden we'll gladly leave to AES, and some are even openly opposed to it. But, different from AES, even on those airports were the developers oppose to AES, you WILL be able to use GSX in full, without moving jetways of course, but all the rest will work.
In any case, this doesn't mean we would never cover jetways, because the FSX system is by no means perfect so, at a certain point in time, GSX will take care of jetways too, but surely not the initial release.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version