General Category > General Discussion
blueprintsimulations with LAX
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: newmanix on February 19, 2011, 03:19:20 am ---I hope someone from their team sees the posts here and trys to make a better effort into the quality and pride of their work... For their sake....
--- End quote ---
They've heard it before...trust me. I've emailed them a couple of times about one of their sceneries and even applied to be a Beta tester. Guess what? I was denied my application to be a Beta Tester because I expressed the same view as you; I'd love to see them increase the level of detail in their work. They explained quite clearly that they aren't trying to produced the highest level of detail sceneries out there. They are going after a certain level and a certain market. And since then, I get it. I get exactly what they are trying to do.
Bruce Hamilton:
--- Quote from: SirIsaac726 on February 18, 2011, 06:59:44 pm ---Based on the screenshots, they look just like their other sceneries.
--- End quote ---
Exactly my point. New buildings, but everything else is recycled.
--- Quote from: newmanix on February 18, 2011, 07:59:43 pm ---...I am going to have to purchase my 20th credit pack...
--- End quote ---
And I thought having a dozen was bad, now I feel like a light weight. ;D
wideloadwhitford:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on February 16, 2011, 04:08:24 pm ---
--- Quote from: olghetta on February 16, 2011, 10:14:27 am ---I don't know how people can buy them!
--- End quote ---
With money. ;D
--- End quote ---
I LOLed
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on February 19, 2011, 04:40:21 pm ---
--- Quote from: SirIsaac726 on February 18, 2011, 06:59:44 pm ---Based on the screenshots, they look just like their other sceneries.
--- End quote ---
Exactly my point. New buildings, but everything else is recycled.
--- End quote ---
And? You're probably right. But it isn't as if they are trying to hide that fact.
newmanix:
I do understand your points Issac and well said. But I am sticking to my opinions. There really should be more pride in their work. I am not trying to compare them to anyone other than the utter lack of pride in the work. They are just throwing it together in a very cheap fashion and overcharging for it. Now that is their right, and people will buy them if the work is worth it to them. My point is why not try at something better? Why not make the effort to improve your work? Why not have a little pride in what you do? I see their work as just some incorrectly shaped objects thrown together and poorly painted. Jeez, the least they could do is try to match the correct color of the buildings they are trying to replicate... I know their ploicy regarding their quality but when they say stuff like "BluePrint Simulations version of KLAX is by far the most detailed and accurate rendition ever attempted for this important airport." They are opening themselves up to my kind of critiscism. They are saying their version is far better then the Cloud 9 version??? They say things like "We know how our products measure up to others" WTF??? Their products measure DOWN to others. They have this sence of pride like their work is better then everyone elses but try to cover themselves from critiscism by saying crap like they are not trying to make the most detailed sceneries. They are oxymorons. I am not being disrespectful I am only stating how I see them protraying themselves to the community and cherging $17.50 for it. They did not want you as a beta testor for 2 reason: 1. Work that bad doesn't really need beta testing. 2. They think they are so damn good, they dont need your poinion of their flaws in their work. So I wouldn't take it personally. And BTW, I have been working at LAX for the better part of 11 years.
Cheers! ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version