General Category > General Discussion
blueprintsimulations with LAX
Deltalpha:
I don't work for BP. I just really hate to see one developer get ripped to shreds on a different developers forum. Go to AVSIM, they wouldn't stand for any of this, but this isn't my board, so not my problem.
newmanix:
--- Quote from: Deltalpha on February 19, 2011, 02:57:23 am ---I don't work for BP. I just really hate to see one developer get ripped to shreds on a different developers forum. Go to AVSIM, they wouldn't stand for any of this, but this isn't my board, so not my problem.
--- End quote ---
Then stop acting like it is... It's too bad Blueprint doesn't have their forum. I am sure the reason is to avoid topics like this from occuring which I am sure would happen. I hope someone from their team sees the posts here and trys to make a better effort into the quality and pride of their work... For their sake....
The thing I love about Umberto's team is the pride! Everytime I hear about the new implimentations into the scenery, I think, that is pride. These guys love what they do and the cost is always well worth it! :)
Deltalpha:
--- Quote ---Then stop acting like it is... It's too bad Blueprint doesn't have their forum. I am sure the reason is to avoid topics like this from occuring which I am sure would happen. I hope someone from their team sees the posts here and trys to make a better effort into the quality and pride of their work... For their sake....
--- End quote ---
If they haven't changed by now, I don't really think they ever will. It's sad because they seem to be doing the major airports! :-\
--- Quote ---The thing I love about Umberto's team is the pride! Everytime I hear about the new implimentations into the scenery, I think, that is pride. These guys love what they do and the cost is always well worth it!
--- End quote ---
Agreed!
newmanix:
--- Quote from: Deltalpha on February 19, 2011, 03:29:34 am ---
--- Quote ---Then stop acting like it is... It's too bad Blueprint doesn't have their forum. I am sure the reason is to avoid topics like this from occuring which I am sure would happen. I hope someone from their team sees the posts here and trys to make a better effort into the quality and pride of their work... For their sake....
--- End quote ---
If they haven't changed by now, I don't really think they ever will. It's sad because they seem to be doing the major airports! :-\
--- Quote ---The thing I love about Umberto's team is the pride! Everytime I hear about the new implimentations into the scenery, I think, that is pride. These guys love what they do and the cost is always well worth it!
--- End quote ---
Agreed!
--- End quote ---
;) :)
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: newmanix on February 18, 2011, 07:59:43 pm ---OMG! It's so obvious they rush their stuff. Just look at how many sceneries they produce every year?? I have worked at LAX for the better part of 11 years and can say without a doubt their focus is NOT about quality. It can't be!! There is no pride at all in their work. Ok let's discuss frames. EVERY other developer out there is finding magical ways to increase detail with out increasing framerates. Blueprint doesn't seem give a damn, they just keep releasing the same quality stuff over and over. They don't seem to be trying to increase the level of quality in their products. I used to feel the EXACT same way about Imaginesim but imagine really is putting pride in their work and it's getting MUCH better with each release. I was quite impressed with WSSS. Just compare that with their first product.
Now compare blueprints KLAX with their first product. Same quality, no pride. I am not bashing, I am stating what is so obvious. If they create respectful products, then I will give them the respect they deserve.
--- End quote ---
How does that mean they rush? It is amazing how you seem to never be able to understand their design philosophy. They DO NOT want to create something like FSDT. They have stated in the past that they don't wish to go after that market. They are going after the market that doesn't necessarily care about the eye candy and AMAZING detail FSDT and FlyTampa and others offer. They are going for a simplistic representation of people's favorite airports. They want something that is in between the default airports and the quality of FSDT, Flytampa, and others. They have said that themselves.
By the way, we get it, you work at LAX. You don't need to tell us every other post. ;)
Again, the only reason I "defend" them is because the bashing they get on various forums is unwarranted and undeserved. It isn't that hard of a concept to understand (the fact that they are producing at a level they want to produce at) and yet, so many people can't get it through their head. And I'll say it again, I am not a fan of that kind of product (just like I'm not a fan of McDonald's or Burger King), but I get what they are trying to do.
Continuing with that analogy...picture FSDT as some high-quality, five star restaurant. Now picture Blueprint as your neighborhood Applebee's or something. Personally, I would rather the high-quality, five star restaurant but some people are very okay with just a simple meal at Applebee's. Some people are okay with the quality of Blueprint sceneries and obviously there is a market for them.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version