General Category > General Discussion
blueprintsimulations with LAX
Bruce Hamilton:
--- Quote from: Deltalpha on February 17, 2011, 04:33:07 am ---Do you really think they are trying to compete with FSDT?
--- End quote ---
They were working on DFW and LAX at the same time as FSDT, and rushed to get theirs out the door first. Sounds like they were competing to me. As for accuracy being their main concern, the product speaks for itself in volumes.
josepha1:
I've purchased their sceneries before. RDU and MCO. If no one else makes the sceneries I want and they make them, I'll buy them.
ckaack:
--- Quote from: josepha1 on February 17, 2011, 07:49:51 pm ---I've purchased their sceneries before. RDU and MCO. If no one else makes the sceneries I want and they make them, I'll buy them.
--- End quote ---
This is what I can understand, because BP sceneries are still better than the default one (even their work is close to FS default). But in case I know a scenery is going to be released by FSDT, FlyTampa, et cetera, I would never spend any cent on a BP scenery. I would sit, wait and relax for a high quality one. But everybody has different drivers and opinions.
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on February 17, 2011, 04:24:27 pm ---
--- Quote from: Deltalpha on February 17, 2011, 04:33:07 am ---Do you really think they are trying to compete with FSDT?
--- End quote ---
They were working on DFW and LAX at the same time as FSDT, and rushed to get theirs out the door first. Sounds like they were competing to me. As for accuracy being their main concern, the product speaks for itself in volumes.
--- End quote ---
Who said they rushed to get their sceneries out? Since their detail isn't to the level of FSDT, they have a significantly less production time. Do you somehow have some information that I don't have that they were rushing?
Frank Lindberg:
I'll ONLY buy airports that support AES ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version