General Category > General Discussion
New Microsoft Flight video look's like actual in game footage
Frank Lindberg:
2012???? I will tell you... Nothing will happens. ;)
PUP4ORD:
2012 ??? Will be just that. :)
Dimon:
I don't care if it looks like FSX. All I need is
1. M-C compatibility.
2. 64-bit interface - this will end all the talks about OOM issues and virtual memory limitation.
As a bonus, I'd like to see improved ATC, but I hope that RC Team will do their job much better than Microsoft.
Other than that, I'm happy that all these years I have been smart enough not to switch to FSX (and obviously I won't switch anyway after MF announcement) and enjoy all the good sides of FS2004.
Frank Lindberg:
--- Quote from: Dimon on October 25, 2010, 01:57:24 pm ---I don't care if it looks like FSX. All I need is
1. M-C compatibility.
2. 64-bit interface - this will end all the talks about OOM issues and virtual memory limitation.
As a bonus, I'd like to see improved ATC, but I hope that RC Team will do their job much better than Microsoft.
Other than that, I'm happy that all these years I have been smart enough not to switch to FSX (and obviously I won't switch anyway after MF announcement) and enjoy all the good sides of FS2004.
--- End quote ---
+1 :) and don't you forget, one of the problems with fsx is FPS also...
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: Dimon on October 25, 2010, 01:57:24 pm ---I don't care if it looks like FSX. All I need is
1. M-C compatibility.
2. 64-bit interface - this will end all the talks about OOM issues and virtual memory limitation.
As a bonus, I'd like to see improved ATC, but I hope that RC Team will do their job much better than Microsoft.
Other than that, I'm happy that all these years I have been smart enough not to switch to FSX (and obviously I won't switch anyway after MF announcement) and enjoy all the good sides of FS2004.
--- End quote ---
Bingo! To be honest, it bugs me when I keep hearing people complain about how it looks like FSX and I have a few comments on that. How many of us actually use the default for a while? Chances are, most of us that care about it looking like FSX are just going to get addons anyway so who cares what it looks like out of the box. And you have to expect it not to look amazing out of the box as they are covering the entire world. There is only so far you can go without making the product too big and require too much resources to run. Personally, all I care about is performance. If it looks like FSX but runs a lot better out of the box than FSX did, I'll be quite happy and you can bet that will be my next sim and not FSX. I've seen what FSX looks like when you have the right addons and it can look AMAZING so if this is like FSX but without the out-of-the-box performance issues, I'll be one happy man.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version