General Category > General Discussion
Intersim studios is no Dead!!
masondom:
Intersim did not decide to adopt eSellerate just like that.
They must have had some connections with FSDT prior to that.
I would put my hand under fire...
Dom Mason
newmanix:
--- Quote from: cmpbllsjc on May 27, 2011, 10:58:12 am ---
--- Quote from: virtuali on May 26, 2011, 09:25:17 pm ---That's news to me. Of course, if they would like to license our sales system, we'll surely not do another KMIA ourselves.
--- End quote ---
Oh no, a possibility of no FSDT KMIA..
I was hoping FSDT would still consider doing KMIA if their product ends up being no good or BluePrint Sim style. I would imagine that a lot of us were hoping for the FPS freindly FSDT version of KMIA, but its understandable if FSDT decides not to do it if their product ends up being a good product.
Now we just need to see if theirs ever gets released. The famous 45 days has come and gone like the wind that they said it would take to complete, so I guess we will just have to wait. Hopefully it come out prior to LAC being completed so that FSDT can evalute their product and the situation before starting the next airport which most likely would have been MIA.
--- End quote ---
True but they keep working on so many projects at once thats why no release yet. But if you saw the pictures from my link the quality by far surpasses Blueprint. Lets just wait for more screenshots and ground textures too. But from what I have seen so far, if the quality deplicted from the screenshots will reflect the entire airport, then no point in FSDT doing it. FSDT can focus on another airport we all want.
Silverbird:
It does look good so far Junor is really approving all the time and it seems he got someone to do the textures having a good texture artist makes a huge huge difference in 3d models and the overall look of the airport objects buildings etc if the textures are bad its gonna look horrible even with the most awesome looking models. will be interesting to see if intersim studios license Umberto's add-on manger with esellarate.
cmpbllsjc:
--- Quote from: newmanix on May 27, 2011, 09:25:17 pm ---True but they keep working on so many projects at once thats why no release yet. But if you saw the pictures from my link the quality by far surpasses Blueprint. Lets just wait for more screenshots and ground textures too. But from what I have seen so far, if the quality deplicted from the screenshots will reflect the entire airport, then no point in FSDT doing it. FSDT can focus on another airport we all want.
--- End quote ---
I didn't see the scren shots before I posted that. All I read was that link you posted but didn't see anything else.
After finding the shots they look pretty good, much better than BluePrint.
Well, you never know now, this just might not be a bad version after all. So far the textures look good, all that remains to be seen is how well it will perform. It seems that performance is always the hardest thing for most developers to master when it comes to designing airports and sceneries. So far FSDT and FT have proven to be the masters of making large hubs in FSX work well, now all we can hope is that Junior and his crew can properly optimize their version to do the same.
I suppose that if it ends up performing as good as it looks I will go ahead and jump on it. Until then I will just stick to using the FS9 version of FT's KMIA in FSX since there is nothing better.
Silverbird:
--- Quote from: cmpbllsjc on May 28, 2011, 03:49:50 am ---
--- Quote from: newmanix on May 27, 2011, 09:25:17 pm ---True but they keep working on so many projects at once thats why no release yet. But if you saw the pictures from my link the quality by far surpasses Blueprint. Lets just wait for more screenshots and ground textures too. But from what I have seen so far, if the quality deplicted from the screenshots will reflect the entire airport, then no point in FSDT doing it. FSDT can focus on another airport we all want.
--- End quote ---
I didn't see the scren shots before I posted that. All I read was that link you posted but didn't see anything else.
After finding the shots they look pretty good, much better than BluePrint.
Well, you never know now, this just might not be a bad version after all. So far the textures look good, all that remains to be seen is how well it will perform. It seems that performance is always the hardest thing for most developers to master when it comes to designing airports and sceneries. So far FSDT and FT have proven to be the masters of making large hubs in FSX work well, now all we can hope is that Junior and his crew can properly optimize their version to do the same.
I suppose that if it ends up performing as good as it looks I will go ahead and jump on it. Until then I will just stick to using the FS9 version of FT's KMIA in FSX since there is nothing better.
--- End quote ---
That is very true Sean optimizing the scenery is also gonna be a very difficult thing to do, especially with a big airport like mia.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version