General Category > General Discussion

KMIA

(1/7) > >>

757 Captain:
Umberto,any news or decision on the KMIA project?

newmanix:

--- Quote from: 757 Captain on October 07, 2010, 09:16:49 pm ---Umberto,any news or decision on the KMIA project?

--- End quote ---

This is a redundant topic you started. You can search the forum to get your question answered.

Didier Chabanne:
Hello

it'll be Miami Latin vfr who will do
for 2011 fs9 and fsx

http://www.latinvfr.com/LatinVFR_-_Sceneries_for_Flight_SImulation.html via forum

cmpbllsjc:

--- Quote from: Didier Chabanne on October 07, 2010, 10:44:02 pm ---Hello

it'll be Miami Latin vfr who will do
for 2011 fs9 and fsx

http://www.latinvfr.com/LatinVFR_-_Sceneries_for_Flight_SImulation.html via forum

--- End quote ---

Didier,

You need to read your own link. Richardo hasn't said they will do it. He's waiting to see if FSDT is going to do it, then make a decision. Although I don't know for sure, just that fact that other developers are waiting to see what FSDT is going to do, would probably make FSDT want to do it since there seems to be anough interest on both the consumer as well as developer side.

CX 747-400:

--- Quote from: cmpbllsjc on October 08, 2010, 02:07:29 am ---
--- Quote from: Didier Chabanne on October 07, 2010, 10:44:02 pm ---Hello

it'll be Miami Latin vfr who will do
for 2011 fs9 and fsx

http://www.latinvfr.com/LatinVFR_-_Sceneries_for_Flight_SImulation.html via forum

--- End quote ---

Didier,

You need to read your own link. Richardo hasn't said they will do it. He's waiting to see if FSDT is going to do it, then make a decision. Although I don't know for sure, just that fact that other developers are waiting to see what FSDT is going to do, would probably make FSDT want to do it since there seems to be anough interest on both the consumer as well as developer side.

--- End quote ---


You beat me to it.
Here is the link to the forum that shows they are waiting.


http://www.flycay.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2618&page=2

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version