General Category > General Discussion
Who is making what SCENERY....
CX 747-400:
SCENERY RELEASE!
Imaginesim has released Singapore WSSS for FSX.
ArtAir:
--- Quote from: newmanix on October 18, 2010, 09:30:18 pm ---
--- Quote from: ArtAir on October 17, 2010, 08:40:38 am ---
--- Quote from: CX 747-400 on October 17, 2010, 02:15:26 am ---
--- Quote from: ArtAir on October 16, 2010, 07:49:01 pm ---
--- Quote from: CX 747-400 on October 16, 2010, 03:35:02 am ---New addition it list!!
Aerofiles: Ottawa CYOW, Vagar EKGV
http://www.aero-files.com/
--- End quote ---
Pls, give the correct link.
--- End quote ---
That is the correct link to the main page. You will see what they are working on by on "Click here to enter the website". Then look for the link that say "forum".
--- End quote ---
FSX only? sadly...
--- End quote ---
I am on his beta testing team. I will check to see if he is willing to backport the scenery to FS9. I think it depends on how well the Billiund is selling for FS9...
--- End quote ---
Ok, I hope...
Thank you
CX 747-400:
SCENERY RELEASE!!
Aerosoft has released Larnaca LCLK for FSX. The FS9 version will be released soon.
cmpbllsjc:
--- Quote from: CX 747-400 on October 20, 2010, 08:47:52 pm ---SCENERY RELEASE!!
Aerosoft has released Larnaca LCLK for FSX. The FS9 version will be released soon.
--- End quote ---
Probably another one with bad FPS as one guy has already complained and I don't doubt that there will be more. Same thing with AntalyaX, OrlyX, and others of people complaining of bad FPS.
Frankly, I am scared to buy anything from Aerosoft as of late becuase it seems that while their airports look nice, they are not optimized nearly enough to perform well. Same goes for some of the stuff they publish like EHAM. I'm not sure after the 26 page complaint of EHAM on their forum if it was substantially patched or not, but there is no way I would buy it now after all that I have read, unless they had a trial or 30-day money back.
In all honestly maybe their stuff is better in FS9, however even some of the latest FS9 offerings I have seen people complain of bad FPS.
After the bad experience I had buying their NiceX, I am really hesitant to buy anything they make, especially with no refund policy.
CX 747-400:
--- Quote from: cmpbllsjc on October 20, 2010, 10:46:50 pm ---
--- Quote from: CX 747-400 on October 20, 2010, 08:47:52 pm ---SCENERY RELEASE!!
Aerosoft has released Larnaca LCLK for FSX. The FS9 version will be released soon.
--- End quote ---
Probably another one with bad FPS as one guy has already complained and I don't doubt that there will be more. Same thing with AntalyaX, OrlyX, and others of people complaining of bad FPS.
Frankly, I am scared to buy anything from Aerosoft as of late becuase it seems that while their airports look nice, they are not optimized nearly enough to perform well. Same goes for some of the stuff they publish like EHAM. I'm not sure after the 26 page complaint of EHAM on their forum if it was substantially patched or not, but there is no way I would buy it now after all that I have read, unless they had a trial or 30-day money back.
In all honestly maybe their stuff is better in FS9, however even some of the latest FS9 offerings I have seen people complain of bad FPS.
After the bad experience I had buying their NiceX, I am really hesitant to buy anything they make, especially with no refund policy.
--- End quote ---
I have almost all the new sceneries that they have released within the last 6 months or so. Except for EHAM, I have never had any issues with FSP. Infact almost all of them have ran better than the default. I havent got LCLK yet, but I dont think that I will have any issues with it. Example would be EDDM: Defaukt I was getting about 10 -14 FSP, with the Aerosoft version, I am getting about 18-25 FPS depending time of day. With frames at the rate, It runs smooth enough that you dont care because you cant see the difference. Do you have any of there newer sceneries? If so, which ones. I will try to find out what the fps issue is from Aerosoft. I would compare Aerosoft to FSDT, or FlyTampa anytime for quality, and performance.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version