General Category > General Discussion
Preview video of Microsofts new sim called "Flight" posted
SirIsaac726:
That almost looks like a real world photo? I highly doubt that is in-game.
anappy:
I can'tsee any of the links they appear dead.
cmpbllsjc:
--- Quote from: SirIsaac726 on August 17, 2010, 08:48:33 pm ---That almost looks like a real world photo? I highly doubt that is in-game.
--- End quote ---
It looked better before I resized it, but it doesn't look all that different from FSX in my opinion, except for the cloud shadows. I wouldn't doubt that it could be an in game shots if you look at the clouds carefully.
Silverbird:
--- Quote from: cmpbllsjc on August 17, 2010, 09:15:31 am ---Here's a link to the preview video: http://content4.cata...055ee71c269.wmv
http://www.microsoft.com/games/flight/
"Introducing "Microsoft Flight"
Twenty-eight years after the debut of "Microsoft Flight Simulator 1.0," Microsoft Game Studios also announced the internal development of "Microsoft Flight," a new Windows exclusive. "Microsoft Flight" will bring a new perspective to the long-standing genre, welcoming everyone, including long-time fans, to experience the magic of flight.
A teaser of the future of Flight on the Windows-based PC is available at http://www.microsoft.../games/flight/.
"
and more info here: http://www.microsoft.com/games/en-us/community/pages/gamescom.aspx
The short video looks pretty good.
I just hope that its a sim and not a game with no ability to addon with airports/planes.
--- End quote ---
Its going to be a very instering time for us simmers I really hope that microsoft signed fsdt for beta so far I have heard that orbx and flytampa are under nda's
cmpbllsjc:
Yeah, George over at FlyTampa just confirmed they are under and NDA. I wonder if Umberto and the FSDT fellows are under the NDA also?
Maybe that's why Umberto said something the other day about them being really busy? Maybe they have more on their plates than just finishing the Hawiian stuff and trouble shooting DFW problems?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version