General Category > General Discussion

Touch and Go Films - Zurich

<< < (2/3) > >>

cmpbllsjc:

--- Quote from: Lindbergh72 on June 11, 2010, 09:57:47 pm ---So I don't have to worry about my spec. or what?

--- End quote ---

Probably not, but the faster the better. You will be a lot happier and have more head room in dense areas if you can OC your proc to 3.75 or better. I saw a world of difference when I went from 3.0ghz to 3.85ghz.

The biggest difference for me with a faster clock was flying into dense hubs like LAX or JFK with a lot of AI and heavy weather. At 3.0ghz I would sometimes get FPS into the mid teens flying the LDS767, now at 3.85 I rarely if ever drop below 20 FPS in any situation.

Frank Lindberg:
This is why I don't understand FSX and it's graphic engine. Why does need SO much power to ran properly?  

I don't see why it's necessary to OC a 2.80 GHz I7 CPU.  :(

cmpbllsjc:

--- Quote from: Lindbergh72 on June 12, 2010, 10:58:52 am ---This is why I don't understand FSX and it's graphic engine. Why does need SO much power to ran properly?  

I don't see why it's necessary to OC a 2.80 GHz I7 CPU.  :(

--- End quote ---

Probably just because its old code that doens't really take advantage of todays multi core processors.

However, OC'ing your cpu is not a big deal and is easier done than in the old days and a lot safer provided you keep an eye on your temps. Its the biggest "free" way to gain performance in FSX. You will never hear anyone saying to get a slower processor, its always been this way with MS flight sims. The faster the CPU the better and easier it will run.

Hopefully in the future if a new sim comes, it will be written to take better advantage of multicore procs.

Frank Lindberg:
Yes, I'm looking forward to Aerosoft's new flight simulator 2012  ;)

PUP4ORD:

--- Quote from: Lindbergh72 on June 12, 2010, 01:27:24 pm ---Yes, I'm looking forward to Aerosoft's new flight simulator 2012  ;)

--- End quote ---
How about MSFSXI perhaps if it comes around...... :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version