General Category > General Discussion

Future Airport projects

<< < (10/21) > >>

juniormafia27:

--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on August 01, 2010, 05:21:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on July 31, 2010, 11:11:29 pm ---No, if you are talking about the video.  This is the link:
--- End quote ---

I can't believe you guys are getting wet over a 1 minute test video with NO airport vehicles, NO service vehicles, and NO AI traffic.  That could be a BP scenery, and I don't mean British Petroleum.   ;D


--- Quote from: AA777-200ER on August 01, 2010, 05:04:59 pm ---FlyTampa= Buffalo (ugh too small=no buy)...
--- End quote ---

In and of itself, I would agree with that, but Buffalo International is being made to mesh with Aerosoft's US Cities Buffalo Niagra, so for a fan of the US Cities series like myself, it's a no brainer.   ;D

--- End quote ---

Ha ha.  Airport vehicles or not.  The airport is finsihed and looks better than the others up to date.  You have to admit that?

Frank Lindberg:

--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on August 01, 2010, 08:18:43 pm ---
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on August 01, 2010, 05:21:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on July 31, 2010, 11:11:29 pm ---No, if you are talking about the video.  This is the link:
--- End quote ---

I can't believe you guys are getting wet over a 1 minute test video with NO airport vehicles, NO service vehicles, and NO AI traffic.  That could be a BP scenery, and I don't mean British Petroleum.   ;D


--- Quote from: AA777-200ER on August 01, 2010, 05:04:59 pm ---FlyTampa= Buffalo (ugh too small=no buy)...
--- End quote ---

In and of itself, I would agree with that, but Buffalo International is being made to mesh with Aerosoft's US Cities Buffalo Niagra, so for a fan of the US Cities series like myself, it's a no brainer.   ;D

--- End quote ---



Ha ha.  Airport vehicles or not.  The airport is finsihed and looks better than the others up to date.  You have to admit that?

--- End quote ---

Roger that  ;) But speaking about Aerosoft's Chicago city addon, will this addon be in conflict with FSDT KORD?

Bruce Hamilton:

--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on August 01, 2010, 08:18:43 pm ---The airport is finsihed and looks better than the others up to date.  You have to admit that?
--- End quote ---

Absolutely, it looks great... but they've boasted about a 30% increase in FPS over the default SFO, and that I have to see to believe.


--- Quote from: Lindbergh72 on August 01, 2010, 08:24:07 pm ---But speaking about Aerosoft's Chicago city addon, will this addon be in conflict with FSDT KORD?
--- End quote ---

Absolutely not, the installer checks for KORD and places it at the top of your scenery above Chicago Cities.

Frank Lindberg:
Thank you Bruce  ;)

AA777-200ER:
Frame-rate quote is hard to believe but it's Orbx/Fsdt quality and is simply beautiful...I want to buy this one, Bruce.  ;D


--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on August 01, 2010, 08:18:43 pm ---
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on August 01, 2010, 05:21:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on July 31, 2010, 11:11:29 pm ---No, if you are talking about the video.  This is the link:
--- End quote ---

I can't believe you guys are getting wet over a 1 minute test video with NO airport vehicles, NO service vehicles, and NO AI traffic.  That could be a BP scenery, and I don't mean British Petroleum.   ;D


--- Quote from: AA777-200ER on August 01, 2010, 05:04:59 pm ---FlyTampa= Buffalo (ugh too small=no buy)...
--- End quote ---

In and of itself, I would agree with that, but Buffalo International is being made to mesh with Aerosoft's US Cities Buffalo Niagra, so for a fan of the US Cities series like myself, it's a no brainer.   ;D

--- End quote ---

Ha ha.  Airport vehicles or not.  The airport is finsihed and looks better than the others up to date.  You have to admit that?

--- End quote ---



Darryl

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version