General Category > General Discussion
Scenery Suggestion
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on March 24, 2010, 10:48:28 pm ---
--- Quote from: PUP4ORD on March 24, 2010, 09:24:42 pm ---KPHX has been done by Mach1 Design,as for KEWR I would like to see it be done FSDT and there are others THAT I have mentioned before in earlier post that could be done as well.
--- End quote ---
Damn Mach 1(no offense). I would rather see a KPHX, KIAH, KDEN, KLAX, KSLC, or KHOU before Newark. And yes AES is a must have.
--- End quote ---
Damn Mach 1? They are freeware. If I were them...offense taken. No reason for that.
Personally, I'm still using my very outdated and old SimFlyers KPHX just because of the texturing and bridge and all the extras in it. However, you can bet that if I never purchased the SF KPHX scenery, I'd find the Mach 1 to be amazing. It is realistic, includes the new tower (and looks spectacular) and accomplishes the job. The best part it...IT IS FREE!
I'd love to see a new, payware KPHX but don't crap on Mach 1 for creating a simplified version of airports when they are free.
juniormafia27:
Yeah. That's right damn Mach 1. And you are not them. Didn't matter if you were. My opinion would stay the same. It was good for it's time. But it's time for something new. Yeah I am just shitting all over Mach 1. Just in case you are still in disbelief. I would rather see someone like FSDT to make either of the airports I listed. Especially for FSX.
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: juniormafia27 on March 25, 2010, 05:37:11 am ---Yeah. That's right damn Mach 1. And you are not them. Didn't matter if you were. My opinion would stay the same. It was good for it's time. But it's time for something new. Yeah I am just shitting all over Mach 1. Just in case you are still in disbelief. I would rather see someone like FSDT to make either of the airports I listed. Especially for FSX.
--- End quote ---
Okay, do you realize that this is someone's hard work (it isn't easy creating FS sceneries...you try) that they basically donated to the millions of people in the Flight Sim community? Crapping on someone's hard work that they are giving away for free is quite obnoxious.
Good for its time? Its time is now...these aren't old sceneries. All of Mach 1's sceneries were probably made within the past two or three years. In case you haven't noticed, some of FSDT's sceneries are older than Mach 1 sceneries. Again, they FSDT is more detailed but if you noticed, they cost money. Mach 1 is free.
OBVIOUSLY, everyone wants to see something more detailed than Mach 1 but that is why Mach 1 is freeware. It is intended to fill the void and give something better than default but not something they could charge $30 for.
Bruce Hamilton:
--- Quote from: Lindbergh72 on March 24, 2010, 09:54:51 pm ---...but why can't there products be AES compatible?
--- End quote ---
Have they ever asked Oliver Pabst to support their sceneries? Freeware sceneries are usually zero credits with AES, so Oliver makes no money for his efforts. If M1 is waiting for him to contact them...
juniormafia27:
@Sir Issac. Again read what I wrote the first time. I don't think it is all that great as you do. So reframe from telling me about the hard work it took. I told you what I thought. So no need to explain...like drivers tell cops all the time(meaning your getting a ticket anyways). Just except that is how some people feel. As I except that is how you feel. ;D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version