General Category > General Discussion
Question for Umberto regarding future developements
virtuali:
--- Quote from: JFKpilot on September 13, 2009, 08:56:10 pm ---Obviously they're not going to be as detailed as PHNL, but I don't want to set my expectations too low or too high.
--- End quote ---
They will be made like any other airport we do. We'll just not go over the top with details, but the design method will be similar to our most recent works.
JFKpilot:
--- Quote from: virtuali on September 13, 2009, 10:16:40 pm ---They will be made like any other airport we do. We'll just not go over the top with details, but the design method will be similar to our most recent works.
--- End quote ---
That's great to hear. Thanks for the quick reply.
cmpbllsjc:
Thanks for reading Umberto. I think I didn't explain very well what I meant as I was thinking faster than I was typing.
What I really meant was airports with custom taxiways/runway and terminals, but using existing objects you have already modeled for the fillers, such as fueling, GA and corporate hangers, trees, things of that nature.
Maybe as much as I hate to say it, but like a bunch of smaller airports with the amout of detail that a BluePrint design might offer. I know a lot of people aren't big on BluePrint stuff, but considering that they do smaller airports that no one else does I buy a few since I feel that they are better than just a default FSX airport.
Again, thanks for reading and I understand your decision to not do these, but I thought I would ask anyway. If there was a way I could buy slightly modified airports like some of the ones I mentioned I would. I already use Instant Scenery once in a while to add stuff, but I hate using stuff from the default library.
Regards
BTW, the Cloud9 version of KMCO was good in my opinion. Granted it didn't have custom runways and taxiways, but it was sure a lot better than the default KMCO. If you offered a lot of airports even at that level I would buy them because I hate the default versions.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version