General Category > General Discussion
Blueprint Sims doing DFW?
SirIsaac726:
Okay, so I've said this MANY times before...but they are targeting a different audience than people buying ImagineSim, FSDT, and FlyTampa. They are trying to get from people who probably just picked up FlightSim and want a quick easy way to get some scenery better than default but don't care about tons of details. Some people, believe it or not, just want accurate representation of the layout and buildings on an airport and don't really care about the high quality textures. Sure there are freeware sceneries that are better to most people but hey, that is there decision not to charge. I personally wouldn't have a problem with people like Shez who make high quality freeware sceneries charging for their products...afterall, they put in TONS of effort.
BOOM:
FSDT has me spoiled now.I can't buy anything else[FlyTampa excluded]because it's a huge disappointment compared to FSDT.
TWA Pilot:
I have to agree with cmpbllsjc.....Blue print is a step above default! I have a few Blueprint airports they are okay....better than default.LOL!!
But unless something has changed FSDT said they we're doing DFW.......I'll wait!!
Regards,
Doug
kyle joseph:
what about simfliers BOOM???
Yeah:
I have Blueprint's Orlando Scenery and it's pretty good, I wasn't disappointed. They could have used custom ground textures but I found some nice replacement default textures so it's okay. I'd def recommend Blueprint if you want scenery for an airport that's pretty much forgotten about.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version