General Category > General Discussion
DFW?
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on February 27, 2009, 04:58:14 am ---
--- Quote from: newmanix on February 26, 2009, 06:05:32 pm ---And FT already did a KSAN...
--- End quote ---
Released in 2003 and never updated. Would you buy scenery that old?
--- End quote ---
Yes. ;) Just like Newmanix I did.
FlyTampa's quality is just as good as FSDT and even their outdated sceneries (minus KMIA and KTPA as those are unbelievably old) are still very good and relatively light on the frame rates.
phenocom:
FT has said that they will not make a KSAN for FSX and we need a KSAN for FSX to go with the excellent MegasceneryX for the Socal Area. It would be fantastic if FSDT could do San Diego and Also a FSX Version of KLAX which was brilliantly done in FS9 by Clould 9
Bruce Hamilton:
--- Quote from: newmanix on February 27, 2009, 10:05:16 pm ---Wouldn't you buy it for those reasons?
--- End quote ---
Yes, if the price would reflect the age of the product. Only $3 cheaper than their newest sceneries.
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on February 28, 2009, 05:21:41 am ---
--- Quote from: newmanix on February 27, 2009, 10:05:16 pm ---Wouldn't you buy it for those reasons?
--- End quote ---
Yes, if the price would reflect the age of the product. Only $3 cheaper than their newest sceneries.
--- End quote ---
But the price does reflect the quality. Just because it is an older product doesn't mean the quality in it has decreased and isn't worth the price. Anyways, it seems wrong to be going on and on about another company's sceneries on FSDT's forums so this is the last I am going to say about this.
newmanix:
In the case of the price, you guys have a point. I think it's more of a matter of how important that airport is to you....
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version