Guys how is KEWR coming along?

[Bruce Hamilton]

How can you say FlyTampa is not on the same playing field as them? That's asinine.

That might've been true before Memphis, but the stuff Umberto pulled off with Couatl put FSDT on a whole new level. And according to Mir, Umberto was going to be teaching him some of it.

[Lude2Envy]

How can you say FlyTampa is not on the same playing field as them? That's asinine.

That might've been true before Memphis, but the stuff Umberto pulled off with Couatl put FSDT on a whole new level. And according to Mir, Umberto was going to be teaching him some of it.

You make it sound like FSDT is the only pioneer in scenery development. There's no doubt that FlightBeam and FSDT have pioneered some tremendous features and effects, but FlyTampa has set the bar themselves time and time again. I think we can all agree that we'd like to see these three developers come together as one to maximize the quality of every future scenery to be released. That's not what this discussion is about though. You're just trolling this thread by stepping on FlyTampa after I said I'd like to see a KATL that's better than Imagine Sim's.

[alexzar14]

Blueprint does only terminals (poorly), and puts it over default plateau (runways/taxiways/grass....), they are too FS98ish.

[Bruce Hamilton]

You're just trolling this thread by stepping on FlyTampa after I said I'd like to see a KATL that's better than Imagine Sim's.

Go back to page 1 and read the entire thread. You're the first person to mention FlyTama, putting them on the same playing field as FSDT and Flightbeam.  I disagree with your statement, so I'm stepping on FlyTampa?  You've been stepping on Imaginesim the entire thread, who's really the one trolling?