General Category > General Discussion
KJFK Review on avsim.com - Dispraise?
virtuali:
--- Quote from: mave128 on November 24, 2008, 08:18:15 pm ---i would suggest you react soon, because possible fsdt cusomers could be alienated.
--- End quote ---
We are not worried about this.
Since the product has a freely downloadable Trial, which has been downloaded by tens of thousand of people already, everybody can see the image quality it's not as been posted on Avsim screenshots. By not correcting the review, the only people that are going to be alienated, are Avsim readers, which will start doubting its reliability.
That's the beauty of having a Trial: a single (fortunately, it's the only one) negative review can't hurt us in any way, especially in this case, which was clearly a problem with the reviewer's settings and/or its machine config.
If we weren't 100% sure about the quality of the scenery, we would probably stop offering Trial versions, and start investing into advertising...
coolcolin09:
Just hold on guys...I'm still working on it.
SirIsaac726:
--- Quote from: virtuali on November 24, 2008, 08:29:52 pm ---a single (fortunately, it's the only one) negative review can't hurt us in any way, especially in this case
--- End quote ---
Not to mention the high amounts of the praise also in the review. He only negatively spoke about the taxiway/ground textures. ;)
Buziel-411:
I noticed the difference in quality of taxiway textures (tarmac and runways are fine, just the taxiways), but the buildings, static ground objects, building textures, static ground object textures, AFCAD, tarmac and runway textures, and the accurateness of the airport make up for it. Besides, after 1 or 2 flights into JFK I got used to it...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version