General Category > General Discussion

Orlando & Miami are on top of my list

(1/4) > >>

christiaan:
I hope that Orlando is next on the list as Cloud 9 only has the FSX version, there are a lot of us out here who still prefer FS9 to FSX,  Miami is also on my list as these two airports along with Amsterdam from Cloud 9, have not been up-dated for a long time,or the company no longer exists like Simflyers.

virtuali:
Orlando is out of the question, because we already made a version for FSX. There's no way we'll ever do a scenery for FS9 only, considering is slowly going down month by month, and if we make a scenery, we intend to sell it even 3 years from now.

Miami and Amsterdam are surely more interesting, because in this case we would do just the FSX version, since the the already available FS9 versions are not that outdated and, in case of EHAM, we are not supposed to directly compete with Cloud9 on FS9, as part of our agreements.

But, in order to do an FSX-only aiport, we need to wait for the remaining FS9 user to finally move away from it. However, KLAX in this case would be more likely than KMIA.

So, basically, if we have to do an FS9-only scenery: no way. We are more willing to make an FSX-only scenery, but just not yet.

christiaan:
Is it possible to back-date Orlando to make it compatible with FS9?, or is easier for you to make a product for FS9 then up-grade to FSX.

I have all of your sceneries & most of Cloud 9, as I think these products are excellent.

I have the FSX but have removed it due to the fact that I have the minimum requirements at the moment just to get the basics, but not much more.

Compliment to your replies on the forums, they always come very fast.

SirIsaac726:

--- Quote from: henry on October 20, 2008, 01:30:49 pm ---Is it possible to back-date Orlando to make it compatible with FS9?, or is easier for you to make a product for FS9 then up-grade to FSX.
--- End quote ---

Coud9 and FSDreamTeam are seperate companies so they cannot.

Bruce Hamilton:

--- Quote from: virtuali on October 20, 2008, 12:52:13 pm ---Orlando is out of the question, because we already made a version for FSX.
--- End quote ---


--- Quote from: SirIsaac726 on October 20, 2008, 10:14:15 pm ---Coud9 and FSDreamTeam are seperate companies so they cannot.
--- End quote ---

If Cloud9 and FSDT are separate companies, and Cloud9 did the FSX version of Orlando, what prevents FSDT from doing their own?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page