General Category > General Discussion

Mexico City Benito Juarez

<< < (3/3)

Rafal:

--- Quote from: virtuali on October 28, 2008, 11:21:06 am ---It's obvious that, in the even we'll ever do an italian airport, it can't be anything except LIRF
--- End quote ---
What about Malpensa? :)

Best regards,
Rafal

virtuali:

--- Quote from: _Dre_ on October 28, 2008, 01:15:36 pm ---I tried the link from the review but it was dead. Is Lago still around? If they no longer exist please reconsider doing these airports (PHNL and LIRF).
--- End quote ---

Yes, LAGO is still alive, they are now part of a big italian company, which distribute and publish videogames for all sort of platforms, I think they are not interested in the flight sim market anymore.

The sceneries are still sold on simmarket, though.

With regard to PHNL specifically, the main issue is the lack of proper updated documentation, especially aerial photos in 3d taken from all angles.

Bruce Hamilton:

--- Quote from: virtuali on October 28, 2008, 02:03:12 pm ---The sceneries are still sold on simmarket, though.
--- End quote ---

Unfortunately, the support link to Lago homepage gives an http 400 error, and you won't get support from simmarket.

thepilot:

--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on October 28, 2008, 04:23:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: virtuali on October 28, 2008, 02:03:12 pm ---The sceneries are still sold on simmarket, though.
--- End quote ---

Unfortunately, the support link to Lago homepage gives an http 400 error, and you won't get support from simmarket.

--- End quote ---

I suppose they just want to make some bucks with their 'addons', so you can't really expect support...

virtuali:

--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on October 28, 2008, 04:23:26 pm ---Unfortunately, the support link to Lago homepage gives an http 400 error, and you won't get support from simmarket
--- End quote ---

The support forum is here:

http://forum.videogame.it/index.php

And they have sales support via email. On the forum, Lago never did much support to begin with, it was us (as usual) who replied to technical questions. Not that these products required much support, they were much simpler than the current ones, with less features, and didn't used any kind of activation, which usually requires to have a much active support from the developer.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page