General Category > General Discussion
any plan for houston -KIAH
thepilot:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on October 21, 2008, 08:41:28 pm ---
--- Quote from: thepilot on October 21, 2008, 08:32:27 pm ---Newark was made by ImagineSim, but it's really not worth buying.
--- End quote ---
I found it very worth buying, along with all their other sceneries. Newark is one of my favorite hubs.
--- End quote ---
Their other sceneries are pretty good, agreed, but Newark is really not my thing...
CX 747-400:
--- Quote from: thepilot on October 21, 2008, 08:44:32 pm ---
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on October 21, 2008, 08:41:28 pm ---
--- Quote from: thepilot on October 21, 2008, 08:32:27 pm ---Newark was made by ImagineSim, but it's really not worth buying.
--- End quote ---
I found it very worth buying, along with all their other sceneries. Newark is one of my favorite hubs.
--- End quote ---
Their other sceneries are pretty good, agreed, but Newark is really not my thing...
--- End quote ---
Newark is a really good scenery, and it serves its purpose. I agree that is not FSDT or Flytampa quality. If you take a close look at ImageSim sceneries, and compare them to what SimFlyers use to make, you can tell that it is the same person / people that are making them. ::)
I am hoping that KIAH will be made by FSDT, FT or Aerosoft / Sim-wings. I dont think anyone else could do it justice.
Silverbird:
I totally agree with you Bruce I love my Newark you need a good system to run it but it was my home town airport and its very accurate and I love it with my aes.
its just not fair to say its not worth buying it. I personally want dfw. believe it or not I would love a Guam scenery its a very small airport you can put a lot of detail on that little scenery. KIAH would be cool to have. wish I won the lottery!! If I do I promise to produce and invest money in fsdreamteam! hehe :) but dfw would be perect for texas. :)
Thats also the cool thing about Imaginesim they give you demos to try out just like fsdreamteam not many people do that.
Bruce Hamilton:
--- Quote from: CX 747-400 on October 31, 2008, 07:07:47 pm ---If you take a close look at ImageSim sceneries, and compare them to what SimFlyers use to make, you can tell that it is the same person / people that are making them.
--- End quote ---
I knew that before I ever invested in their scenery, found it in the "about us" section. Tried the demo versions and found them more than acceptable quality wise... when you add a very nice discount for multiple sceneries and AES compatibility, they're hard to pass up.
CX 747-400:
--- Quote from: Bruce Hamilton on November 01, 2008, 07:04:33 pm ---
--- Quote from: CX 747-400 on October 31, 2008, 07:07:47 pm ---If you take a close look at ImageSim sceneries, and compare them to what SimFlyers use to make, you can tell that it is the same person / people that are making them.
--- End quote ---
I knew that before I ever invested in their scenery, found it in the "about us" section. Tried the demo versions and found them more than acceptable quality wise... when you add a very nice discount for multiple sceneries and AES compatibility, they're hard to pass up.
--- End quote ---
I would have to agree with you about the discount compared to quality. For what they charge for there scenery, it is worth purchasing
to get rid of the default scenery. I dont even mind to say that I am still using some simflyers sceneries since they are better than anything else out there
at the moment. I have a strange feeling that I will be retiring the Simflyers KLAS sometime soon. Still waiting for KIAH and KMCO to be built for FS9.
Jonathan
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version